<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politic.osm.net</link>
	<description>Opinion and analysis on global politics, events and the people in power ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:59:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris B</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-47280</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-47280</guid>
		<description>I had decided I was going to ignore the UK election. Like many others, I have been angry at the Labour Party for getting involved with Bush and the Iraq War and have found their policies to be far more conservative than I had liked. I had expected a lot more from British Labour, particularly on the European front. But what are they offering? No entry to the Euro. No entry to Schengen (borderless Europe). I see Europe as a major part of the many ways to world peace. Britain under Labour wasn&#039;t leading.

But what was the alternative? A return to Thatcherism under the Conservative Tory Party. In other words, a lose/lose situation.

Then bingo! Out of nowhere come the Liberal Democrats. Nick Clegg grabbed world headlines for his party as a result of a very good showing in the first of three debates, and polls now show that the Labour Party may be forced into a coalition with the Liberal Democrats. They have lost a little bit of momentum since the first debate, but there is still a good chance they could form a coalition with Labour.

The mainstream media, led by arch villain Rupert Murdoch, went berserk! Throwing all sorts of bullshit at the Liberal Democrats. Most of it was contrived. So much so that most of the general public didn&#039;t buy it. May be Britain does have a real alternative to the two parties controlled by the establishment. I don&#039;t know. But I would certainly love the chance to find out.

Nick Clegg is also very big on Europe. On that point alone Nick has won me. Nick has also said Brown must go, as part of the coalition deal. Two out of two ain&#039;t bad.



&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/02/general-election-2010-conservatives-short-majority-poll&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Latest Guardian Poll&lt;/a&gt; 


&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_clegg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Nick Clegg in Wikipedia.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had decided I was going to ignore the UK election. Like many others, I have been angry at the Labour Party for getting involved with Bush and the Iraq War and have found their policies to be far more conservative than I had liked. I had expected a lot more from British Labour, particularly on the European front. But what are they offering? No entry to the Euro. No entry to Schengen (borderless Europe). I see Europe as a major part of the many ways to world peace. Britain under Labour wasn&#8217;t leading.</p>
<p>But what was the alternative? A return to Thatcherism under the Conservative Tory Party. In other words, a lose/lose situation.</p>
<p>Then bingo! Out of nowhere come the Liberal Democrats. Nick Clegg grabbed world headlines for his party as a result of a very good showing in the first of three debates, and polls now show that the Labour Party may be forced into a coalition with the Liberal Democrats. They have lost a little bit of momentum since the first debate, but there is still a good chance they could form a coalition with Labour.</p>
<p>The mainstream media, led by arch villain Rupert Murdoch, went berserk! Throwing all sorts of bullshit at the Liberal Democrats. Most of it was contrived. So much so that most of the general public didn&#8217;t buy it. May be Britain does have a real alternative to the two parties controlled by the establishment. I don&#8217;t know. But I would certainly love the chance to find out.</p>
<p>Nick Clegg is also very big on Europe. On that point alone Nick has won me. Nick has also said Brown must go, as part of the coalition deal. Two out of two ain&#8217;t bad.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/02/general-election-2010-conservatives-short-majority-poll" rel="nofollow">Latest Guardian Poll</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_clegg" rel="nofollow"> Nick Clegg in Wikipedia.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gould</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41957</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41957</guid>
		<description>Oops: maybe I should make a speech. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops: maybe I should make a speech. <img src='http://politic.osm.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gould</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41956</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41956</guid>
		<description>Blushes.

Thanks very much. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blushes.</p>
<p>Thanks very much. <img src='http://politic.osm.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catrina</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41954</link>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41954</guid>
		<description>The Politic 101 Golden Gong award is our highest honour.  It is reserved for our bravest and best.  Today I am pleased to announce our first recipient.  

One moment while I open the envelope ... *shuffle, shuffle, ..&quot;

&lt;blockquote&gt;And the winner is...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh my god, yes, it is, and so deserved, it&#039;s ...

&lt;blockquote&gt;David Gould&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For standing up for the things that matter, for standing up for his family, for going that extra mile, and for standing up for all of us.  

Thank you David.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.hootingyard.org/archive/gong.jpg&quot;/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Politic 101 Golden Gong award is our highest honour.  It is reserved for our bravest and best.  Today I am pleased to announce our first recipient.  </p>
<p>One moment while I open the envelope &#8230; *shuffle, shuffle, ..&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>And the winner is&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh my god, yes, it is, and so deserved, it&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>David Gould</p></blockquote>
<p>For standing up for the things that matter, for standing up for his family, for going that extra mile, and for standing up for all of us.  </p>
<p>Thank you David.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hootingyard.org/archive/gong.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catrina</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41620</link>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41620</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;REGISTRATION POLICY UPDATE&lt;/b&gt;

Since the launch of this site we have enabled users to self register as subscribers, allowing administrative updates of accounts as required for people to write posts and stuff.  Over the last few months the site has been subject to automated account creation operations that have exceeded spam messages in quantity.  In response I have disable self registration.  From here on anyone wanting to request an account should post a note here and I&#039;ll take care of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>REGISTRATION POLICY UPDATE</b></p>
<p>Since the launch of this site we have enabled users to self register as subscribers, allowing administrative updates of accounts as required for people to write posts and stuff.  Over the last few months the site has been subject to automated account creation operations that have exceeded spam messages in quantity.  In response I have disable self registration.  From here on anyone wanting to request an account should post a note here and I&#8217;ll take care of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41269</guid>
		<description>David Gould-
thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Gould-<br />
thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catrina</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41245</link>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41245</guid>
		<description>David Gould on the front cover of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/fears-on-extreme-school-seminars/1663523.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Canberra Times&lt;/a&gt; ...

A special gold star for David Gould for standing up for what is right and taking the extra steps necessary to protect our children and our values.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://osm.net/images/0908/gold-250.jpg&quot;/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Gould on the front cover of the <a href="http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/local/news/general/fears-on-extreme-school-seminars/1663523.aspx" rel="nofollow">Canberra Times</a> &#8230;</p>
<p>A special gold star for David Gould for standing up for what is right and taking the extra steps necessary to protect our children and our values.</p>
<p><img src="http://osm.net/images/0908/gold-250.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41205</guid>
		<description>:sad:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://politic.osm.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':sad:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HusseinStWorm</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41201</link>
		<dc:creator>HusseinStWorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41201</guid>
		<description>At the risk of inflaming the situation again, and please feel free to delete this if you think it will do that, Cat, I must say I&#039;m disappointed that KR has so publicly exited the blog. KR is capable of writing some really interesting stuff when he is not trying to corral the blog into a resemblance of the Op-Ed pages of the New York Times. If the supposed groupthink of this site, such as KR sees it, is the thing he sees as necessary to dedicating himself to railing against then perhaps a reassessment of life&#039;s priorities may be in order.

Such is life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of inflaming the situation again, and please feel free to delete this if you think it will do that, Cat, I must say I&#8217;m disappointed that KR has so publicly exited the blog. KR is capable of writing some really interesting stuff when he is not trying to corral the blog into a resemblance of the Op-Ed pages of the New York Times. If the supposed groupthink of this site, such as KR sees it, is the thing he sees as necessary to dedicating himself to railing against then perhaps a reassessment of life&#8217;s priorities may be in order.</p>
<p>Such is life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catrina</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/about/editorial-policy/comment-page-2/#comment-41193</link>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?page_id=77#comment-41193</guid>
		<description>Kirribilli Removals at 154
&lt;blockquote&gt;As long as someone uses flowery over-puffed rhetoric to be insulting, you don’t object.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Oh, the cunning use of rhetoric in the delivery of an insult. That I don&#039;t mind providing that the cunning in the rhetoric can be parsed to mean different things - but that is the point of cunning bit of the &#039;cunningly rhetoric&#039; equation.  In contrast - that last bit on your #232 comment was an example of rhetoric without cunning. After all, even Arnold Schwarzenegger knows how to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/27/schwarzenegger-sends-lawm_n_336319.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;send a message&lt;/a&gt; while maintaining plausible deniability.
&lt;blockquote&gt;And once again, ask yourself where all the thinkers have gone.
Probably got pretty bored with the ‘enforced’ group think too.
Chalk up another one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Just like everyone here, you&#039;re welcome to stay, you&#039;re welcome to go, and should you go you should know that you will be welcome back any time.  Thing is, those quirky editorial policies will be standing no matter what you choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirribilli Removals at 154</p>
<blockquote><p>As long as someone uses flowery over-puffed rhetoric to be insulting, you don’t object.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, the cunning use of rhetoric in the delivery of an insult. That I don&#8217;t mind providing that the cunning in the rhetoric can be parsed to mean different things &#8211; but that is the point of cunning bit of the &#8216;cunningly rhetoric&#8217; equation.  In contrast &#8211; that last bit on your #232 comment was an example of rhetoric without cunning. After all, even Arnold Schwarzenegger knows how to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/27/schwarzenegger-sends-lawm_n_336319.html" rel="nofollow">send a message</a> while maintaining plausible deniability.</p>
<blockquote><p>And once again, ask yourself where all the thinkers have gone.<br />
Probably got pretty bored with the ‘enforced’ group think too.<br />
Chalk up another one.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just like everyone here, you&#8217;re welcome to stay, you&#8217;re welcome to go, and should you go you should know that you will be welcome back any time.  Thing is, those quirky editorial policies will be standing no matter what you choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
