<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politic 101 &#187; GhostWhoVotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politic.osm.net/author/ghostwhovotes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politic.osm.net</link>
	<description>Opinion and analysis on global politics, events and the people in power ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 05:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Senate: Democrat By How Much?</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GhostWhoVotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been clear for a long while now that the Democrats will increase their control of the US Senate, the question has always been by how much and can they reach the 60 votes required to win a vote on &#8216;cloture&#8216; and force though legislation. With several races in the bag and others that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been clear for a long while now that the Democrats will increase their control of the US Senate, the question has always been by how much and can they reach the 60 votes required to win a vote on &#8216;<a title="cloture" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloture#United_States" target="_blank">cloture</a>&#8216; and force though legislation. With several races in the bag and others that could go either way, I thought I would look at the races and state how likely it is that the Democrats will reach the magic number.</p>
<p><span id="more-245"></span></p>
<p>The Democrats currently control 51 seats in the 100 seat Senate. There are 35 senate elections occurring on November 4, 11 of which are considered competitive and 10 of those are currently held by the Republicans. The only Democratic seat in any danger is in Louisiana and is held by Mary Landrieu. The last poll conducted by a major polling organisation had her lead ballooning out to 53-37 on Aug 17, so she should now be safe.</p>
<p>The Republican seats that are almost certain to fall are Colorado, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Virginia. Alaska is looking sure to fall as well, where Sen. Ted Stevens is not only likely to lose his seat, but is also at risk of crossing his Bridge only to discover that while Nowhere lacks basic amenities, it does have a jail cell. That gets the Democrats to 56.</p>
<p>The seats that are currently statistical ties are Minnesota and Oregon, with North Carolina&#8217;s last 3 polls being 48-42 Rep, 35-35 Tie and 51-45 Dem for a average of 42.67 each. In Mississippi Republican Roger Wicker has held a lead of about 48-43 for a couple of months while in Maine, Susan Collins looks sure to retain her seat.</p>
<p>Taking the optimistic view that the economic situation will help the Democrats, it therefore leaves the Senate line-ball on either 59 or 60. A more reserved outlook however would put the Democrats on 56.</p>
<p>There is also the question of Joe Lieberman. If the Senate becomes 56-44, there is a chance that he would be thrown out of the party. However if the result is 59-60 then the need to ensure his vote will see him remain. Lieberman will not leave himself, as that would lose him his positions on committees, including 3 chairmanships. The Democrat numbers also include Independent Socialist Bernie Sanders from Vermont, but there is not question that he will continue to causus with the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>857</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Play</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/numbers-and-opinions/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/numbers-and-opinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GhostWhoVotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that Obama will retain all the Kerry states, including New Hampshire. I also believe he will win Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio and Virginia. Read on to discover  how Barack Obama will capture 310 electorial votes against 228 for John McCain.

With the current state of the polls and people&#8217;s interpretations of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Obama will retain all the Kerry states, including New Hampshire. I also believe he will win Colorado, Iowa, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio and Virginia. Read on to discover  how Barack Obama will capture 310 electorial votes against 228 for John McCain.</p>
<p><span id="more-177"></span></p>
<p>With the current state of the polls and people&#8217;s interpretations of what the polls say is going to happen in 8 weeks varying by a large amount, I thought I would state just what is required to win in November, and what I personally believe will happen.</p>
<p><i>The Numbers</i></p>
<p>The results in 2004 were Kerry 251, Bush 286. The states that Obama can possibly take from McCain according to the polls are Colorado (9), Florida (27), Indiana (11), Iowa (7), Missouri (11), Montana (3), New Mexico (5), North Carolina (15), North Dakota (3), Nevada (5), Ohio (20), South Dakota (3) and Virginia (13). The states McCain can possibly take are Michigan (17), New Hampshire (4), Pennsylvania (21) and Wisconsin (10).</p>
<p>This gives Obama and McCain absolute maximums of 383 and 338 respectively.</p>
<p>Now to be more realistic about the candidate&#8217;s chances, the only state that McCain can reasonably believe he can take is New Hampshire. Obama on the other hand is almost guaranteed Iowa, while Colorado, Florida, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio, and Virginia are all very much in play.</p>
<p>This means that Obama&#8217;s likely maximum is 333 while McCain&#8217;s is 290.</p>
<p>Barack Obama needs 19 electoral votes more than Kerry to win, or 23 if McCain takes New Hampshire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/numbers-and-opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>542</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin for VP and Two Speeches</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/palin/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GhostWhoVotes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollbludger.wordpress.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With John McCain&#8217;s selection of Sarah Palin for VP, one can only shake their head at how amateurish a decision this was. Palin&#8217;s stance on abortion will result in few Democratic women voters being willing to even listen to her, let alone changing their vote. Her age and lack of experience do major self-afflicted damage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With John McCain&#8217;s selection of Sarah Palin for VP, one can only shake their head at how amateurish a decision this was. Palin&#8217;s stance on abortion will result in few Democratic women voters being willing to even listen to her, let alone changing their vote. Her age and lack of experience do major self-afflicted damage to the attacks on Obama and she is even involved in a scandal where the Alaskan State Commissioner of Public Safety was fired by her because the commissioner refused to fire a state trooper who had divorced her sister. Ultimately, this decision is very short sighted and the VP Debate now has all the makings of a massacre.</p>
<p><span id="more-178"></span></p>
<p>Meanwhile the Conventions continue. Obama&#8217;s speech, which received praise from all but the most biased of judges, now places McCain under a very powerful spotlight. If McCain does not produce a speech that is at least somewhat comparable to Obama&#8217;s, then his last chance to win the election by himself (as opposed to requiring Obama to make multiple huge gaffes) is most likely gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>653</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

