<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politic 101 &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politic.osm.net/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politic.osm.net</link>
	<description>Opinion and analysis on global politics, events and the people in power ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:38:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Nation&#8217;s Health: the good, the bad and the ugly</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2010/03/a-nations-health-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2010/03/a-nations-health-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Enemy Combatant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic votes on Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/2010/03/a-nations-health-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An open thread in which to dicuss the ramifications of legislation currently being voted upon in The House. Will American citizens benefit as much as the Health Corps? Will the trillion-plus fistful of dollars be enough to make a dint in the diseases of the underclasses? And what will need happen for lawmakers to release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An open thread in which to dicuss the ramifications of legislation currently being voted upon in The House. Will American citizens benefit as much as the Health Corps? Will the trillion-plus fistful of dollars be enough to make a dint in the diseases of the underclasses? And what will need happen for lawmakers to release a few dollars more to help their constituents in West Baltimore, &#8221;South Central&#8221; L.A. and those who like to go Deer Hunting with Jesus (the one reputed to have been a legendary healer himself, in his day)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2010/03/a-nations-health-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1291</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>G20: Iranian Nuclear Facility</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2009/09/nuclear-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2009/09/nuclear-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarkozy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[September 25, 2009
STATEMENTS BY PRESIDENT OBAMA, FRENCH PRESIDENT SARKOZY, AND BRITISH PRIME MINISTER BROWN ON IRANIAN NUCLEAR FACILITY
Pittsburgh Convention Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

8:43 A.M. EDT
PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Good morning.  We are here to announce that yesterday in Vienna, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France presented detailed evidence to the IAEA demonstrating that the Islamic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 25, 2009</p>
<p>STATEMENTS BY PRESIDENT OBAMA, FRENCH PRESIDENT SARKOZY, AND BRITISH PRIME MINISTER BROWN ON IRANIAN NUCLEAR FACILITY</p>
<p>Pittsburgh Convention Center<br />
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania</p>
<p><span id="more-994"></span></p>
<p>8:43 A.M. EDT</p>
<p>PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Good morning.  We are here to announce that yesterday in Vienna, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France presented detailed evidence to the IAEA demonstrating that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been building a covert uranium enrichment facility near Qom for several years.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, the Iranian government presented a letter to the IAEA that made reference to a new enrichment facility, years after they had started its construction. The existence of this facility underscores Iran’s continuing unwillingness to meet its obligations under U.N. Security Council resolutions and IAEA requirements.  We expect the IAEA to immediately investigate this disturbing information, and to report to the IAEA Board of Governors.</p>
<p>Now, Iran’s decision to build yet another nuclear facility without notifying the IAEA represents a direct challenge to the basic compact at the center of the non-proliferation regime.  These rules are clear:  All nations have the right to peaceful nuclear energy; those nations with nuclear weapons must move towards disarmament; those nations without nuclear weapons must forsake them.  That compact has largely held for decades, keeping the world far safer and more secure.  And that compact depends on all nations living up to their responsibilities.</p>
<p>This site deepens a growing concern that Iran is refusing to live up to those international responsibilities, including specifically revealing all nuclear-related activities.  As the international community knows, this is not the first time that Iran has concealed information about its nuclear program.  Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear power that meets the energy needs of its people.  But the size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program.  Iran is breaking rules that all nations must follow — endangering the global non-proliferation regime, denying its own people access to the opportunity they deserve, and threatening the stability and security of the region and the world</p>
<p>It is time for Iran to act immediately to restore the confidence of the international community by fulfilling its international obligations.  We remain committed to serious, meaningful engagement with Iran to address the nuclear issue through the P5-plus-1 negotiations.  Through this dialogue, we are committed to demonstrating that international law is not an empty promise; that obligations must be kept; and that treaties will be enforced.</p>
<p>And that’s why there’s a sense of urgency about the upcoming meeting on October 1st between Iran, the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, and Germany.  At that meeting, Iran must be prepared to cooperate fully and comprehensively with the IAEA to take concrete steps to create confidence and transparency in its nuclear program and to demonstrate that it is committed to establishing its peaceful intentions through meaningful dialogue and concrete actions.</p>
<p>To put it simply:  Iran must comply with U.N. Security Council resolutions and make clear it is willing to meet its responsibilities as a member of the community of nations.  We have offered Iran a clear path toward greater international integration if it lives up to its obligations, and that offer stands.  But the Iranian government must now demonstrate through deeds its peaceful intentions or be held accountable to international standards and international law.</p>
<p>I should point out that although the United Kingdom, France, and the United States made the presentation to Vienna, that Germany, a member of the P5-plus-1, and Chancellor Merkel in particular, who could not be here this morning, wished to associate herself with these remarks.</p>
<p>I would now like to turn to President Sarkozy of France for a brief statement.</p>
<p>PRESIDENT SARKOZY:  (As translated.)  Ladies and gentlemen, we have met yesterday for a meeting — a summit meeting of the Security Council on disarmament and nuclear disarmament.  I repeated my conviction that Iran was taking the international community on a dangerous path.  I have recalled all the attempts that we have made to offer a negotiated solution to the Iranian leaders without any success, which what has been revealed today is exceptional.  Following the enriching plant of Natanz in 2002, it is now the Qom one which is revealed.  It was designed and built over the past several years in direct violation of resolutions from the Security Council and from the IAEA.  I am expecting from the IAEA an exhaustive, strict, and rigorous investigation, as President Obama just said.</p>
<p>We were already in a very severe confidence crisis.  We are now faced with a challenge, a challenge made to the entire international communities.  The six will meet with the Iranian representatives in Geneva.  Everything — everything must be put on the table now.</p>
<p>We cannot let the Iranian leaders gain time while the motors are running.  If by December there is not an in-depth change by the Iranian leaders, sanctions will have to be taken.  This is for the peace and stability.  Thank you.</p>
<p>PRIME MINISTER BROWN:  America, the United Kingdom, and France are at one.  Iran’s nuclear program is the most urgent proliferation challenge that the world faces today.</p>
<p>As President Obama and President Sarkozy have just said, the level of deception by the Iranian government, and the scale of what we believe is the breach of international commitments, will shock and anger the whole international community, and it will harden our resolve.</p>
<p>Confronted by the serial deception of many years, the international community has no choice today but to draw a line in the sand.  On October the 1st, Iran must now engage with the international community and join the international community as a partner.  If it does not do so, it will be further isolated.</p>
<p>And I say on behalf of the United Kingdom today, we will not let this matter rest.  And we are prepared to implement further and more stringent sanctions.</p>
<p>Let the message that goes out to the world be absolutely clear:  that Iran must abandon any military ambitions for its nuclear program.  Thank you.</p>
<p><i>THE WHITE HOUSE<br />
Office of the Press Secretary</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2009/09/nuclear-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game, Set, Match?</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2009/09/game-set-match/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2009/09/game-set-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The drama over the August break was largely predictable and for the most part has burnt itself out.  The death of Ted Kennedy disrupted the news feed and it&#8217;s only in the last 24 hours that the talking heads have managed to refocus on the downside to throwing grandma off the train (or a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://osm.net/images/0909/axelrod-obama-100.jpg" height="100"/><img src="http://osm.net/images/0909/emanuel-obama-100.jpg" height="100"/><img src="http://osm.net/images/0909/axelrod-100.jpg" height="100"/></p>
<p>The drama over the August break was largely predictable and for the most part has burnt itself out.  The death of Ted Kennedy disrupted the news feed and it&#8217;s only in the last 24 hours that the talking heads have managed to refocus on the downside to throwing grandma off the train (or a Republican if that&#8217;s your preferred option).<br />
<span id="more-941"></span></p>
<p>In the meantime an article over on <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26672.html">Politico</a> has some interesting snippets of information.  David Axelrod said in a telephone interview earlier today in response to questions about the healthcare reform agenda:</p>
<blockquote><p>“We’re entering a new season, it’s time to synthesize and harmonize these strands and get this done. We’re confident that we can do that. But obviously it is a different phase. We’re going to approach it in a different way. The president is going to be very active.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Politico goes on to suggest &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama&#8217;s specifics will include many of the principles he has spelled out before, and aides did not want to telegraph make-or-break demands. But Axelrod and others are making plain that Obama will assert himself more aggressively — a clear sign that the president will start dictating terms to Congress.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thing is, an environment has been created wherein the public and standing members of the Senate have been calling for Obama to step up to the plate &#8211; to take the lead.  It is difficult at this stage of the game to accuse Obama of ramming his own agenda down the throat of a hostile Senate.  One could argue that this is the set piece in the game-set-match scenario. In support of this proposition I place before you a track record of Obama&#8217;s effectiveness in playing process, backed by the inside acumen of Rahm Emanuel, in a script penned by one David Axelrod.  </p>
<p>Sept. 15 is the deadline that the White House gave Senate negotiators to seek a bipartisan bill. As Chris would say, &#8216;timing is everything&#8217;.</p>
<p><b>UPDATE: 3 SEP 2009</b></p>
<p>Obama is scheduled to speak to both houses of Congress on the 9 SEP 2009 during which it is being widely reported that he will spell out his expectations with respect to the shape of a final healthcare bill.  </p>
<p><b>UPDATE: 09 SEP 2009</b></p>
<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s speech to the members of Congress.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/32773968#32766830">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/32773968#32766830</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2009/09/game-set-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>503</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Longest Odds</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2009/01/the-longest-odds/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2009/01/the-longest-odds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to thank all the speakers and performers for reminding us, through song and through words, just what it is that we love about America. And I want to thank all of you for braving the cold and the crowds and traveling in some cases thousands of miles to join us here today. Welcome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank all the speakers and performers for reminding us, through song and through words, just what it is that we love about America. And I want to thank all of you for braving the cold and the crowds and traveling in some cases thousands of miles to join us here today. Welcome to Washington, and welcome to this celebration of American renewal.</p>
<p><span id="more-579"></span></p>
<p>In the course of our history, only a handful of generations have been asked to confront challenges as serious as the ones we face right now. Our nation is at war. Our economy is in crisis. Millions of Americans are losing their jobs and their homes; they’re worried about how they’ll afford college for their kids or pay the stack of bills on their kitchen table. And most of all, they are anxious and uncertain about the future &#8211; about whether this generation of Americans will be able to pass on what’s best about this country to our children and their children.</p>
<p>I won’t pretend that meeting any one of these challenges will be easy. It will take more than a month or a year, and it will likely take many. Along the way there will be setbacks and false starts and days that test our fundamental resolve as a nation. But despite all of this &#8211; despite the enormity of the task that lies ahead &#8211; I stand here today as hopeful as ever that the United States of America will endure &#8211; that the dream of our founders will live on in our time.</p>
<p>What gives me that hope is what I see when I look out across this mall. For in these monuments are chiseled those unlikely stories that affirm our unyielding faith &#8211; a faith that anything is possible in America. Rising before us stands a memorial to a man who led a small band of farmers and shopkeepers in revolution against the army of an Empire, all for the sake of an idea. On the ground below is a tribute to a generation that withstood war and depression &#8211; men and women like my grandparents who toiled on bomber assembly lines and marched across Europe to free the world from tyranny’s grasp. Directly in front of us is a pool that still reflects the dream of a King, and the glory of a people who marched and bled so that their children might be judged by their character’s content. And behind me, watching over the union he saved, sits the man who in so many ways made this day possible.</p>
<p>And yet, as I stand here tonight, what gives me the greatest hope of all is not the stone and marble that surrounds us today, but what fills the spaces in between. It is you &#8211; Americans of every race and region and station who came here because you believe in what this country can be and because you want to help us get there. It is the same thing that gave me hope from the day we began this campaign for the presidency nearly two years ago; a belief that if we could just recognize ourselves in one another and bring everyone together &#8211; Democrats, Republicans, and Independents; Latino, Asian, and Native American; black and white, gay and straight, disabled and not &#8211; then not only would we restore hope and opportunity in places that yearned for both, but maybe, just maybe, we might perfect our union in the process. This is what I believed, but you made this belief real. You proved once more that people who love this country can change it. And as I prepare to assume the presidency, yours are the voices I will take with me every day I walk into that Oval Office &#8211; the voices of men and women who have different stories but hold common hopes; who ask only for what was promised us as Americans &#8211; that we might make of our lives what we will and see our children climb higher than we did.</p>
<p>It is this thread that binds us together in common effort; that runs through every memorial on this mall; that connects us to all those who struggled and sacrificed and stood here before.</p>
<p>It is how this nation has overcome the greatest differences and the longest odds &#8211; because there is no obstacle that can stand in the way of millions of voices calling for change.</p>
<p>That is the belief with which we began this campaign, and that is how we will overcome what ails us now. There is no doubt that our road will be long. That our climb will be steep. But never forget that the true character of our nation is revealed not during times of comfort and ease, but by the right we do when the moment is hard. I ask you to help me reveal that character once more, and together, we can carry forward as one nation, and one people, the legacy of our forefathers that we celebrate today.</p>
<p><i>Transcript<br />
Obama’s Speech at the Lincoln Memorial<br />
Washington, D.C.</p>
<p>Sunday, January 18, 2009</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2009/01/the-longest-odds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1711</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Dawn</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/11/a-new-dawn/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/11/a-new-dawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="more-341"></span><iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/27546437#27546437" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/11/a-new-dawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>651</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With bated breath &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/11/with-baited-breath/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/11/with-baited-breath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Catrina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are so many things that have happened in our recent history &#8211; things that have changed the world, things that change the definition of destiny, things that change who we think we can be, what we think we can achieve, things that change the boundaries of what is and is not.  The West [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many things that have happened in our recent history &#8211; things that have changed the world, things that change the definition of destiny, things that change who we think we can be, what we think we can achieve, things that change the boundaries of what is and is not.  The West Wing gave us a glimpse of what it could be like.  Season 7 took us though the Primaries with Matt Santos the minority candidate and into the general election under the guiding hand of Josh Lyman as they set the stage for Barack Obama and David Axelrod.</p>
<p><span id="more-330"></span></p>
<p>Reality kicked in on the 10th February 2007 when Obama announced his national campaign at the place where just some 149 years earlier, Abraham Lincoln delivered his &#8220;House Divided&#8221; speech.  A primary campaign sometimes referred to as the &#8216;Never Ending Story&#8217; took us through to the 3rd. June when Obama was nominated as the presumptive candidate therein setting the stage for the national campaign between Barack Obama and John McCain.</p>
<p>Today is Sunday the 2nd. November 2008, just a couple of days away from the most important political moment in my life.  Within 72 hours we will be watching the numbers rolling in.  But unlike every other election &#8211; the substance and the implications of this election are tectonic in nature.  </p>
<p>Today we wait with bated breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/11/with-baited-breath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1146</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama for VP</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/obama-for-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/obama-for-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am no psephologist, but as the owner of one of those V-thingies, I have had a particular interest in the women in this election. Sadly, with one exception, they have shamed my gender and behaved in general as if they have one of those P-thingies instead.

Hillary – the Great White hope. Before this election [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am no psephologist, but as the owner of one of those V-thingies, I have had a particular interest in the women in this election. Sadly, with one exception, they have shamed my gender and behaved in general as if they have one of those P-thingies instead.</p>
<p><span id="more-306"></span></p>
<p>Hillary – the Great White hope. Before this election got interesting I hoped and assumed that Hillary would trounce the republicans and we would see a woman in the White House. As an avowed feminist this was pleasing indeed and seemed to make this election a trailblazer for that reason alone. Anything to see the end of George the Imbecile, and what better way to turn the tables on neo-conservatism than to see a democrat woman as POTUS.</p>
<p>She is charismatic, confident, assured and knowledgeable. It turns out she is also rabidly ambitious and prepared to play dirty to that end. I was amazed at some of the stunts she pulled , the fake accents, the lies about her foreign affairs experience and worse, her preparedness to smear Obama when the Primary race got tight. Hillary believed that she had an entitlement to be back in The White House and she dragged it out to the bitter end, which was damaging for the party, and ultimately herself.</p>
<p>Then there’s the Stepford wives. Cindy McCain who has behaved like a handbag: an attractive accessory (if you like plastic), with not much content. She has conducted herself like all good wives from the 50’s should – well groomed, and silently supporting her man. Who knows what she really thinks? She represents a thankfully bygone era where a woman’s only public role was to be seen to support her man. Even when he has publicly humiliated her and called her a “Stupid C-nt”. If she had divorced him and spoken out against abuse of women she would be deserving of admiration. Instead she relies on his success for her identity. Not the kind of role model I want for my daughters.</p>
<p>And the First Lady – Laura . I actually feel sorry for her – after all she sleeps with George every night, so she is punished enough and in an act of sisterly solidarity I shall harm her no more.</p>
<p>My favourite anti-hero of this election is of course Sarah Palin. Not much I can say that hasn’t been said, and nothing anyone can say that betters Tina Fey. She will become a symbol of all that is loathed about the American Character – an arrogant, brash, ignorant, fundamentalist who does not have the intelligence to know that she isn’t. But she is also frightening – a juxtaposed “I can do anything” feminist persona overlaying a basic narrowness that is determined to undo some of the rights that women have fought and even died for &#8211; most particularly the right to choose whether to proceed with an unplanned pregnancy. This in my view makes her one of the most dangerous female politicians in the public arena today. Whatever your personal view on abortion is, it is not her right to impose hers on all American women. It’s bad enough that she’s doing it to Bristol.</p>
<p>Then onto the stage strides Michelle Obama. A woman of intelligence and style. A woman who clearly supports her husband but has her own views on matters of public policy. A mother and partner who has a successful career. A woman who can talk and think for herself. And an African American who must know first hand what it means to live in a country which has not reached it’s potential, but may in fact be about to. This is a role model for my daughters, and for all of us who aspire to see women in public life reflect the best of us.</p>
<p>Frankly – I wish she was VP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/obama-for-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1370</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Dull Debate or Blue Touch Paper, Lit?</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/another-dull-debate-or-blue-touch-paper-lit/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/another-dull-debate-or-blue-touch-paper-lit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jaundiced view</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The McCain team is feverishly attempting CPR on the lifeless thing that is their campaign. Will the third and last debate provide the super-defibrillator they need?
The possibilities for excitement on stage today all hinge on McCain. To what do you ‘throw the switch’ in these circumstances, in which you are 8-10 points down nationally with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCain team is feverishly attempting CPR on the lifeless thing that is their campaign. Will the third and last debate provide the super-defibrillator they need?</p>
<p>The possibilities for excitement on stage today all hinge on McCain. To what do you ‘throw the switch’ in these circumstances, in which you are 8-10 points down nationally with 3 weeks to go? Vaudeville won’t help. He’s already tried that with Sarah the ventriloquists’ dummy. Perhaps you say, <i>“We’ve got nothing to lose, let’s go for the goolies.”</i>  If Rove and his ilk are now running things, that is probably what McCain will attempt. Even winning the talking points in the debate is not sufficient for him.</p>
<p><span id="more-294"></span></p>
<p>Of course, this debate could be as dull as the “Town Hall” dirge-fest if Obama gets to run it his way. He ‘won’ the last debate by simply appearing cool. It didn’t matter a jot what he said, providing it wasn’t ‘courageous’ or even stimulating. It was all about Presidential poise. Due to that success and the Dems lead in the polls, Obama is highly unlikely to deviate from the minimalist approach now. </p>
<p>The danger for Obama is if McCain manages to wreck the debate with accusations, taunts and dirt, and succeeds in getting Obama down in the gutter with him. The aim would be to diminish the Presidential aura that Obama now has, and that McCain certainly does not. But this is also dangerous for McCain. If the tactic fails, and Obama stays above the fray, McCain will appear to be nothing other than the stumbling, flailing old dope he is. </p>
<p>McCain has already said he will be raising the Ayers ‘connection’ in the debate – ho hum &#8211; but that may only be an indicator of a full-on effort to unbalance Obama and prevent him from staying ‘in charge’ during the event.</p>
<p>Unless something radical is done now, the game will just slip away for McCain. The issue is whether he graciously accepts the impending crushing loss, or uses a last opportunity to tip over the card table which could, in the Rovians grotty little worldview, just possibly even things up again. One thing is certain: McCain shaking hands with a war veteran in the audience and saying ‘My friends’ 50 times won’t do the job.</p>
<p>My prediction is of a 70% chance of fireworks from McCain, and if so, a 95% chance of Barry holding the high ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/another-dull-debate-or-blue-touch-paper-lit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>626</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red is Blue and the Whitehouse Black</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/red-is-blue-and-the-whitehouse-black/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/red-is-blue-and-the-whitehouse-black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ferny Grover</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Left is right; Keynes is King; Banks are poor and your average worker is&#8230;.well&#8230;poorer. And in the midst of it two candidates vie for what has become the poisoned chalice that is the Presidency of the United States.

Look at what&#8217;s happening in the world right now. Today&#8217;s Crikey headline summed it up well: &#8220;Everywhere you look: Carnage!&#8221; They&#8217;re talking about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left is right; Keynes is King; Banks are poor and your average worker is&#8230;.well&#8230;poorer. And in the midst of it two candidates vie for what has become the poisoned chalice that is the Presidency of the United States.</p>
<p><span id="more-254"></span></p>
<p>Look at what&#8217;s happening in the world right now. Today&#8217;s Crikey headline summed it up well: &#8220;Everywhere you look: Carnage!&#8221; They&#8217;re talking about the world economy &#8211; the response to the Bail Out has been less that bullish with the stock markets in the USA, Europe, Japan, Russia &#8211; hell let&#8217;s just say everywhere &#8211; heading south today.</p>
<p>Carnage could just as easily describe John McCain&#8217;s campaign. The two are linked like Siamese twins &#8211; and one of them has died. Actually, it&#8217;s more like Siamese triplets&#8230;.the Bush Government, the world economy and the McCain campaign. One has died, one is dying and the third is stumbling around carrying the dead weight. That&#8217;s what happens with the conjoined &#8211; you just can&#8217;t get away from your siblings. So there&#8217;s Macca dragging around a corpse (Bush) and a near corpse (the economy). We won&#8217;t mention those other albatrosses (oh yes we will) - the wars he says could last a hundred years or his VP pick from hell.</p>
<p>And as the world around him panicswhat does the Siamese Triplet do? I said it earlier &#8211; to counter this threat McCain will start seriously addressing the issues of concern to the electorate, thus re-establishing his credibility and restoring confidence in his ability to govern with wisdom and compassion. NAH! Chucking mud is easier. So while Grandpa and Minnie indulge in shadow mud wrestling, the markets take yet another dive and the people’s confidence in McCains ability to lead plummets. McCain’s answer? More mud! Even if it’s old mud &#8211; Ayers, Rezko &amp; Wright. Some’s gotta stick, right?? Yep John &#8211; but it’s stickin’ to you!&#8221;</p>
<p>Over at Time Online Mike Murphy wrote</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Palin should drop the braying attacks on Obama’s aging hippie bomber pals and start connecting to her cherished hockey moms on the one issue they are actually worried about; a quickly slowing economy. Chuck the hacky and ineffective negative ads and switch to man on the street spots with real people voicing their real doubts about Obama; too weak to stand up to Washington’s mighty special interest cartel or the newly empowered Democratic bosses of the Congress and Senate, too liberal to know how to fix the economy, too inexperienced to handle a dangerous world. On Tuesday, McCain should look into the camera and connect to the 80 million scared and worried Americans who will be watching him.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>RCP&#8217;s Jay Cost disagrees. He thinks McCain&#8217;s only option is to keep throwing the mud. &#8220;One party&#8217;s vicious smear is the other&#8217;s vital truth. That&#8217;s just the way it is&#8221; he opines today.</p>
<p>Jay is wrong. A panicked America isn&#8217;t listening. They want comfort, they want assurance and they want answers. McCain isn&#8217;t giving any of it it so they&#8217;re dropping the old guy like a stone. Look at the numbers! The map is a mass of blue. Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, New Mexico. Commenting on today&#8217;s polls 538&#8217;s Nate Silver says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Are John McCain&#8217;s negative attacks succeeding in eating into some of Barack Obama&#8217;s support? They certainly aren&#8217;t yet. In fact, Barack Obama has had perhaps his strongest individual polling day of the year&#8230;You can read these numbers as well as I can. Obama leads by 6 in North Carolina? 12 in Virginia? 7 in Florida? 3 in Missouri? Obviously, I am cherrypicking some of the more pro-Obama results here &#8230; but the point is, there are a <i>lot</i> of favourable results these days for Barack Obama.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So if McCain looks tired and burdened going into the next debate. Sympathise. He&#8217;s carrying a lot of baggage. If he&#8217;s looking blue, it&#8217;s just the reflection of what&#8217;s going on all around him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/10/red-is-blue-and-the-whitehouse-black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>671</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s the economy stupid!</title>
		<link>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/its-the-economy-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/its-the-economy-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris B</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Thread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politic.osm.net/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are about to witness the biggest landslide in US political history. Everything is against the Republicans. History tells us that no incumbent party overlooking such an economic disaster, survives. Everything is pointing to wipeout. Never mind the fact that the Democrats have 8 out of the top 10 major issues going for them. None [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are about to witness the biggest landslide in US political history. Everything is against the Republicans. History tells us that no incumbent party overlooking such an economic disaster, survives. Everything is pointing to wipeout. Never mind the fact that the Democrats have 8 out of the top 10 major issues going for them. None of that counts when it comes to the economy. Bill Clinton won well when the economy was on the down turn. This is different, the economy is an unmitigated disaster, who are they going to blame? </p>
<p><span id="more-236"></span></p>
<p>The Republicans. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter that they have the most corrupt US government ever, the war in Iraq doesn&#8217;t matter. The &#8220;200 year old man&#8221; running for president doesn&#8217;t matter. Neither does the hillbilly running for VP. Forget about Hurricane Katrina, the health care in a mess, returned soldiers being in squalid conditions in hospitals. None of that matters. It&#8217;s the economy stupid! If you didn&#8217;t hear that, it&#8217;s THE ECONOMY STUPID!</p>
<p>To sum it all up, I give you Obama&#8217;s latest ad, which I couldn&#8217;t have said better.</p>
<p><a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/whoadvises_ad/">http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/whoadvises_ad/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://politic.osm.net/2008/09/its-the-economy-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1290</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
