All through the ages, the first thing the great dictators did when they got into power was to burn the books. There hasn’t been a time throughout history when a dictator hasn’t burned or banned books. Whether it be Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung, Napoleon, Brezhnev, George Bush or Sarah Palin. Even now countries such as China, Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Iran, North Korea and Cuba just to name a few have strong censorship laws.
I came up through the sixties and seventies working for Collins Book Sellers who were battling the Henry Bolte/Aurthur Rylar government’s arcane censorship laws. Books like The Little Red School Book, Portnoy’s Complaint, The Outcasts of Foolgarah, Lady Chatterley’s Lover, were books that we were able to use to challenge the law; along with various editions of Playboy. Gough Whitlam came along and there was a new dawn with books. Most of the old rules were overturned and in Victoria there was very little trouble any more because Bolte was gone. Although in Queensland they still had Joh Bjelke-Petersen.
Labor governments in Australia through the ages have been on the progressive side of censorship. The Howard Government was doing it’s best to bring in strong censorship laws. Once even getting a law that would have had anyone arrest and charged for loading any sort of porn onto the Internet inside or outside the country, that is, if you were uploading porn to the USA you would be charged. It was stopped on the way to getting governors’ approval. Whose definition of porn was it?
I was most relieved when Kevin Rudd was elected. No more trouble with censorship laws. The ALP had more sense. The ALP would have much smarter people working in that department. No more trouble. Imagine my horror when I received an email from my son about the Great Firewall of Australia. You cannot imagine the anger and swear words that came from my mouth. The thing that really disappoints me the most is the amount of talent in the ALP that has not stood up against this law. One person in particular who is my hero, Maxine McKew, for beating John Howard in Bennelong. I have my own personal desktop background of the Bennelong result, she has not been stood up on this issue. Maxine is not the highest person in the ALP but she comes from a very strong media background. I expected that she would have taken a stand on this issue. But Maxine is not alone. There are many others in the ALP who remain silent.
Why won’t the firewall work? First of all, you could never make it a word based program. There are two many words that cross over, for instance the first and most obvious word is sex. If you ban the word sex, you also ban communicating with Middlesex and Sussex, you could never mention the word sextant. You would stop any email with a job application asking the persons sex or any document asking for your sex. That would just about grind the Internet to a halt in Australia. What about Virgin? Well there goes Virgin Airlines, Virginia and West Virginia for a start, then the online bible. Most of the words to do with women’s sexual health would be out. To show how effective a word based censorship firewall is to try blocking the word Viagra in your email. Ads by using the word Viagra will still get through. It cannot be done, because I still get V!agra Vi*gra and Viagr* coming through.
Senator Conroy says he only wants to ban child porn sites. Well I can tell why it won’t stop the child porn sites. Even if he blocked every site it would still get into Australia very, very easily. How? Every laptop coming into the country. Every portable USB hard drive on a key ring. Has anyone mentioned to Senator Conroy that the new portable hard drives can hold over 1Terabyte of information? Then there is Peer to Peer networks. His system won’t be able to block those at all. The record companies have been unsuccessful in stopping them, how is he going to stop them? Anybody with a little bit of computer knowledge can do that. Just ask your kids to show you how. Ask them about Limewire. Peer to Peer networks are a giant whole in Senator Conroy’s firewall, so big you could drive a truck through it.
Point inhibitor, is the first treatment generated in the viagra going to buy cialis daily pills. Doit, on viagra 100mg acheter prix donner des suppléments de racine.
Senator Conroy’s intention is to block illegal websites. He has a budget allocated for that. It will be very difficult to do that for the present standard of the Internet without blocking a lot of innocent sites. But what Senator Conroy has not taken into account the huge explosion of the Internet in the USA that’s about to happen under Barrack Obama. Free up restrictions on the Internet, introducing broadband to large amounts of untouched area’s in the USA. Senator Conroy’s system will slow the Australian Internet down under today’s system. It will be worse when Obama’s Internet kicks in.
Let’s say Senator Conroy is 100% successful in the sites he blocks. All are correct none that shouldn’t be are blocked. The ALP is tossed out at the next election. The Liberals win in a landslide and Tony Abbott is the new Minister for communications. Not a nice thought is it? That would be senator Conroy’s fault.
Senator Conroy’s 40 million dollars would be much better spent and far more effective on extra police to crack down on child pornography. Oh I forgot, he can’t give that to another department can he?
Obama’s Internet Revolution Begins.
http://www.toptechnews.com/news/Obama-Brings-Cyber-Sensibility/story.xhtml?story_id=0320013Q3J4W&full_skip=1
1,645 replies on “Censorship”
EC at 1500
Not having though about euthanasia that much … it just seems to me that from an economics point of view, it’s good for government. But if government is holding back it’s because of the adverse polling of religious groups. Is that all this is really about?
Cat, havn’t really followed the debate with deadly earnest, just a weather eye. My understanding is that a significant majority of Australians want to be able to “say goodnight” on their own terms. It’s the direct lobbying of politicians by establishment religious heavies that is sandbagging legislative change.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ROPcZ8S_nwE&feature=related
Wonder if some of this has “gone to a good money home” like Mr Madhof’s $50bil
Fed Refuses to Disclose Recipients of $2 Trillion (Update2)
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=apx7XNLnZZlc&refer=home
Fed to People: trust us, we’re Central Bankers:
Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve refused a request by Bloomberg News to disclose the recipients of more than $2 trillion of emergency loans from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aGvwttDayiiM&refer=home
(christ yer quick, gaffy!)
1491
Catrina
Having sung that one thru i am now brushing up on some Xmas Carols, I will be very busy, there are a few to learn;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lenore-skenazy/the-year-in-carols_b_150669.html
1431
Kirri
This is further to yours.
It’s beyond me.
Why would anyone give the government money for free?
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/postcards-from-the-bond-market-edge-2-28681
1431
Sounds like some of that $2 tril getting laundered to me!!!
Gaffy, the T Bills are very short term, so the loss of a percent or two (annual) over a few weeks is the cost of ‘parking’ cash that investors clearly do not entrust to banks. It’s the fear of the financial system crashing that has driven the rates down.
But buying a longer bond has even bigger problems: first one is, what about inflation? Even now the real level of US inflation is probably well over 3%. But even more scary is the fact that you’ve bought this thing at the absolute nutcracking TOP of the market and there is nowhere but down for this thing to go in price. It could drop 10, 20, 30 percent at any time and your miserable 3% return (currently on the 30 yr) ain’t gonna cover your ass.
And the moment there’s some hunger for risk, and return, restored in the market, the colossal sound you’ll hear will be that of the cash being sucked out of Treasuries. It’ll be the Twin Towers all over again!
KR thanks for that.
You do have to laugh…no, you really HAVE to!
Just examine, if you will, these two excerpts pertaining to the financial scandal du jour in Seppoland:
The Securities and Exchange Commission, which investigated Mr. Madoff in 1992 but cleared him of wrongdoing, appears to have been completely surprised by the charges of fraud.
…and this one:
While Mr. Madoff’s firm was not a hedge fund, the scope of the fraud is likely to increase pressure on hedge funds to accept greater regulation and transparency and protect their investors.
…so, as you can see, the SEC utterly failed to spot the humongous fraud this guy was perpetrating, BUT, even more regulation will somehow, miraculously, work better?
Maybe….NOT! LOL
Like I said, you have to laugh.
1499 Catrina Any system is open to abuse. The conservatives could run a scare campaign to get something up they wanted. Murdoch combined with Alan Jones and 3AW could run a scare campaign to get what they wanted. But till recently country towns had been controlled by one local paper and a local radio station. This gave the conservatives strong control over huge parts of the country, because they controlled both of those in most cases. Also a limited amount of television didn’t help. But broadband Internet is about to change all that massively. Tapping into grass roots support is a very good way of by passing the old paradigms and controls. Reaching people that have had very little contact with Labor ideals.
This have huge advantages, which would by far outweigh the downsides.
It is a very good way to get the message out and get feedback. Mind you at the massive speed things are developing on the Internet anyone not adapting will be left behind. When you consider that the USA under Obama’s Internet revolution, will probably double the size of the Internet at least in the USA by 2012. Maybe faster. Then all the new innovation that will come along with it. Cyrillic alphabet Internet sites will start to appear en mass shortly. One third of the worlds population has not been able to access the Internet because of the lack of a Cyrillic alphabet on the Internet. More innovation.
What I am actually trying to say is, whatever you start out with will probably rapidly change. But not to start at all would be a huge mistake. The Internet is tapping into a mass of brain power, so everything is evolving at a rapid pace.
Subvert the dominant paradigm.
paddy, enjoyed Arundhati Roy’s article on Mumbai and her wider take on The Imbecile’s “GWOT”. No wonder the PNAC/GOPper/MIC warmongers-for-profit despise her.
They can’t handle the truth.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175013
“Subvert the dominant paradigm.”
I love it when you get a bit Bolshie and talk like a commie, Chris.
Thanks comrade.
President-elect Obama on Saturday announced Shaun Donovan as his choice to run the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-picks-donovan-to-lead-hud-2008-12-13.html
EC I’m still digging for that gold. I must be half way to China by now.
I’m getting close.
It’s mine, mine, mine. It’s all mine!
Hassan chop.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=J37CUN0ix7s
I new you’d get it.
Goodnight. I’m buggered.
The Daily Show: Mike Huckabee and Jon Stewart debate gay marriage.
What Mike Huckabee doesn’t get, Ghostie.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=O_ViptIyZZI
Something to make one sweat…..
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/12/deflation-has-become-inevitable.html
Movement in Minnesota
http://www.electoral-vote.com
Daschle to be true health czar.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16542.html
Huckabee’s argument that gay marriage somehow tarnishes the institution of marriage is, as usual, a crock. It’s analogous to the argument that me taking my own life before the terminal disease does somehow diminishes our ‘respect’ for life.
Both arguments are the tyrannical exercise of moral choice over others. That is, they get to ‘feel good’ about something while I get to suffer the consequences, and as Stewart points out, the downside for gay people is considerable. (From memory, as I saw this episode a few days ago, Stewart even tried to appeal to Huck’s notion of a ‘fair go’ as we’d say, but to no avail).
As usual, Jon Stewart presents the voice of reason, tolerance, and balance, all delivered with humour…he is a CLASS act, and I’ll miss him over the break.
I loved the line he used on the bible bashing Mike, who tried to infer that homosexuals make a choice to live a ‘bad’ lifestyle: “So when did you decide to be heterosexual?”
Touche!
I noticed Mike then avoided that spurious line of argument from that moment, and moved onto the other ones on the list of specious excuses for treating homosexuals like second class citizens.
God they’re a sick bunch of bigots, who spend their time getting their knickers in a twist about what to call homosexual’s cohabitation status as if their society would implode to call it marriage.
Meanwhile, their society IS imploding, but it’s got absolutely nothing to do with homosexual’s legal rights.
1525
That’s certainly an “interesting” read BO.
Even if it *is* a little depressing on a wet Sunday morning.
At least I’ve stuffed Kev’s christmas present under the mattress and not gone into treasury bonds.
I think at this stage, I might just invest in a few good bottles of wine.
At least I’ll be able to drink them, while hiding in the cellar from the bandits. 🙂
Switzerland opens its borders.
more..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7778022.stm
A couple of gems from a newly discovered goldmine of joy.
Obviously a certain US politician reads harold’s planet.
http://harolds-planet.blogspot.com/2008/10/how-to-feel-important.html
As do many million Americans.
http://harolds-planet.blogspot.com/2008/11/tuesday-04-november-2008.html
Wanna buy a sick cow Kirri?
http://www.dilbert.com/
Obama stimulus could reach $1 trillion: report.
President-elect Barack Obama’s team is considering a plan to boost the recession-hit U.S. economy that could be far larger than previous estimates and might reach $1 trillion over two years, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4BC1PV20081213
FOX News Poll: Most Americans Positive About Obama’s Cabinet
This must stick in their gullet. More..
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/11/fox-news-poll-americans-positive-obamas-cabinet/
Another day, another huge fraud, this one committed by a NY lawyer who swindled investors out of meagre $380m (so far). He just sold dodgey company notes, straight out scam, and of course he lived an incredibly lavish lifestyle.
So the US legal profession is now in a panic that they will be tainted and their clients will be asking to ‘see the money’. A run on lawyers? yeah, why not? Another financial panic to add to the bonfire of the inanities.
It gets worse by the day.
1535
Given that every country has it’s “least favourite” profession Kirri.
The US must rate Lawyers pretty close to the bottom.
Conspicuous consumption might just become a life threatening pastime in the near future.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/nyregion/14lawyer.html?hp
The end of the “American Dream” draws closer by the hour.
“The end of the “American Dream” draws closer by the hour.”
paddy, there’s a good deal of historical evidence to support your assertion.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=_lTduTwqtjY&feature=related
A sobering read about the US Iraqi Reconstruction effort.
New York Times: Report Spotlights Iraq Rebuilding Blunders
Banks and consumers brace for new credit card rules
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE4BC1YK20081213?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews
Now that’s all well and good……..But it seems that Reuters, like all other media, is trying to save on sub-editorial staff.
Try this on for size further down the same page.
Ummm…….Unless that wine I’ve been drinking has totally screwed up my basic maths. That would mean over 2000 credit cards issued to each and every American. 🙂 Please someone tell me I’m wrong!
I am starting to think that Kevin Rudd’s broadband will be well out of date by the time it is built. Just noting my own usage has rocketed in the last 3 months with political videos. But now I have discovered a huge amount of World War Two aircraft on You Tube (my hobby). I can see the use of videos on the net is only going to grow at a pace outweighing the rate of building a faster network.
paddy at 1539
I’m guessing that the statement would make more sense if we substituted ‘Americans’ with the credit card holders around the world who’s cards are issued by the listed companies.
It has taken a year so far and we are still waiting.
Oh lordy, lordy, the fun never stops in Liberal land, does it? A report in today’s SMH has it that Costello will stay on and contest his seat again, so to be there when Turnbull’s leadership falls over! LOL
How comical is that? Obviously the hard liners aren’t happy with Malcontent, and are dying to shaft him. But resurrecting Bracket Creep?
Oh, spare me.
Blago & Badger knew instinctively when to go for a Big Play.
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64191
Kid Kahuna bursts from the tube scoring another “Perfect 10”.
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64190
paddy, liked this para from your link.
“Since spring 2008, as US investment banks sold off assets, imposed margin calls, and used access to unsegregated wholesale assets in custody in the rest of the world to upstream liquidity to their US-based parents and affiliates, the dollar has strengthened relative to other currencies. The media reports this as a “flight to quality”, but it is more like a last looting of the surrounding countryside before dangerous brigands hole up in their hilltop fortress. The brigands appear temporarily wealthy compared to the peons left stripped and penniless and facing winter. When the brigands have eaten all the stolen grain and livestock, however, they will have no means to replenish except to use force to raid the countryside again. The peons can always hunt, forage, farm and carefully husband a surplus to gradually increase their wealth. If the brigands raid too thoroughly or too regularly, the peons have no incentive to grow crops or keep herds (negative savings returns) and everyone starves (deflation).”
Kirri, there is no way Smirking Man will ever be PM of Oz.
So what if $weetie uses his years of parliamentary savvy and contacts to roll Petit Mal. Big deal! Enough Australians have had a gutful of the gutless wonder to guarantee that any “Costello for PM” quest is forever doomed.
Australians will never elect a leader who has no bottle, who won’t go in and fight for the top job. The bloke is a flake.
Pixie will be relishing this, so will Julia Prole who has Smirker’s measure and then some.
Good evening team.
I saw that you were debating euthanasia earlier. The involuntary one where someone is very sick isn’t much of a problem. Given that everyone dies eventually, there is hardly an controversy about withdrawal of treatment. It happens all the time.
The voluntary euthanasia debate is much harder. I personally don’t think the process should be “medicalised”. It’s absolutely frought with problems. If someone wishes to commit suicide, I’d prefer they do it without my help. There are plenty of ways to do it without a doctor.
1541
Cat. On further reflection (and a few more wines) I think there’s a simpler explanation for the remarkable credit card numbers cited.
A simple typo, replacing billions for millions. 🙂
Heck, even with the entire global population, 690 Billion cards would mean 10 CC’s for every man woman and child on the planet!
It’s really getting heavy with Obama.
Reporters get personal with Obama.
more…
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16537.html
I can just see the Republicans saying, “See we told you so”. Just a celebrity. 😆
Diogenes @ 1546
Dio – I just wrote this very large(by my standards) post outlining a number of things with cavets here and safegaurds there
I just deleted it, I would like to know your opinions first.
I
Sorry – “the reasons for your opinions” first… note to self ; carefull when deleting large amounts of text
Ecky, the Smirk will provide us with endless comedy, but alas, he’s NEVER going to get to poll position on the greasy poll, for all the reasons you stated.
1546
Evenin Dio
Did you get sick of helping Glen build all those nuke power plants. LOL
Palin’s Wasilla Church Damaged By Arson.
more..
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/13/politics/main4667513.shtml
Frank Rich, in the NY Times, puts the governor’s little caper into perspective against the Enron and Wall Street fiascoes and the hyped up war that Idiot George concocted:
Our next president, like his predecessor, is promising “a new era of responsibility and accountability.” We must hope he means it. Meanwhile, we have the governor he leaves behind in Illinois to serve as our national whipping boy, the one betrayer of the public trust who could actually end up paying for his behavior. The surveillance tapes of Blagojevich are so fabulous it seems a tragedy we don’t have similar audio records of the bigger fish who have wrecked the country. But in these hard times we’ll take what we can get.
…so a pretty petty sleaze bag deal gets the attention, while the massive corruption that has buggered their country mostly goes without penalty to the perpetrators.
Justice is indeed blind.
EC and Kirri
Even Laurie Oaks is sinking the boot in to the Smirk for leader bit.
He sinks it in to the lot of them as well,LOL
More here
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24791015-5000117,00.html
Good to see you again, Dio. Appreciate your thoughts on this controversial subject. Legalisation seems to be working without too many complications in European countries.
1548
Penny Arcade: The Crisis
Gaffhook
That hurts! I’m in the nukes are fine if they were economical and carbon efficient camp. They are neither though. I think they’re relatively safe but should go the way of the dinosaurs.
Spam Inbox
From a doctors POV, anyone who is “well” as opposed to being in imminent danger of dying is not considered someone we would want to “kill”. Withdrawal of treatment is “easy” for want of a better word but actively killing someone is something we just aren’t trained for.
Palliative care should be able to treat the pain, but not always I accept. Helplessness and depression can be treated in most occasions. So when someone wants to die from terminal cancer etc, from a doctors POV there has been a failure of treatment. When our treatment fails, our response is to try a new one, increase dose etc. You can always increase the dose of morphine etc. We often do things like that to relieve suffering, knowing that it will shorten someones life but the primary aim is palliation not euthanasia (although the border can get a bit blurry).
I don’t think that it’s necessary for doctors to get involved in most cases. There are plenty of ways for almost anyone to commit suicide. I’m not wedded to this opinion though and could be persuaded into the other camp. It honestly is very seldom an issue, although working in a hospital, when the end comes it tends to be fairly fast.
Glad to see that Kev07’s new Freedom of information is working well! Obviously you can see what you want as long as you can pay for it.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24792756-31477,00.html
ha! This time it’s the Swiss bank accounts that get drained:
ZURICH (Reuters) – Geneva-based banks and investment funds have lost more than 5 billion Swiss francs ($4.22 billion) in the alleged $50 billion fraud by former Nasdaq chairman Bernard Madoff, Swiss newspaper Le Temps reported on Saturday.
…oooops!
That’s a nice line Gaffy, and just perfect for the Smirk. God I love watching the conservatives wallowing around in their own stupidity.
Kirri
According to this article there are quite a few foreign countries stung by Madhof.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24800663-12377,00.html
Bush ducks two shoes hurled by Iraqi.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16566.html
1564
Loved this bit from your link Chris.
Hell, give that journalist a book contract at once. 👿
Plus, according to the Fox clip, Dana Perino suffered a black eye from the scrum of secret service agents trying to protect the imbecile.
I’d call that two for the price of one.
Telstra excluded from national broadband tender process.
more..
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24800794-661,00.html
Bush is right, though: this incident demonstrates that progress has been made in Iraq. Would anyone have thrown a shoe at Saddam Hussein? If they had, what would have been the result?
The question is: is the relative freedom that Iraqis have now worth the price that they have paid for it?
Is our current freedom worth the price that many of those who came before paid for it?
Uni results:
pass for computing – dissappointed a touch, but as I do not like computing at all and it is not a basis for me going on to further study, not too worried.
distinction for discrete mathematics – should have been an HD, but two questions on the exam were not printed correctly and so they were not counted for anyone’s grade. Given that these were questions that I aced, not too happy. But a distinction is fine.
high distinction for linear algebra – very happy with this result. I studied hard, which was good as the exam was very difficult. As a result, I got most of it correct.
🙂
Excellent David. Well done.
1567 David Gould That’s a lot of deaths to enable someone to throw a shoe. Then there’s all the lying cover ups corruption torture and the massive numbers of injuries. They still haven’t got Bin Laden. Terrorism is still going on.
Congrats on the results DG
Great news.
As for the price of shoes……Comparisons between Bush and Hussein aren’t really worth the price of a bale of straw.
They are/were both responsible for the deaths of uncounted innocents. Neither will survive the judgment of history and Bush is not the leader of Iraq. [Elected or otherwise]
Telstra out of broadband plan.
more..
http://business.theage.com.au/business/markets/telstra-out-of-broadband-plan-20081215-6yi9.html
Video of Bush and the shoes throwing incident. 😆
http://media.theage.com.au/?category=Breaking%20News&rid=44532
Diogenes @ 1559
Even doctors will admit that upping the dose of morphine for terminally patients is often not effective to relieve extreme suffering. It certainly wasn’t in the case of my mother.
Katielou
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. There is normally something we can give although some pain is really hard to control especially pain related to nerve damage.
There is a risk with voluntary euthanasia that society will form the expectation that the terminally ill will chose this option rather than struggling on and resentment could build up against the people who need help the most. There is also the danger that palliative care will be under-resourced if this is seen as a money-saving opportunity by bureaucrats.
paddy,
I question whether Bush is responsible for the deaths of uncounted innocents in the same way as Saddam was responsible for the deaths of uncounted innocents.
Morally equating starting a war with fighting a war by deliberately targetting civilians is a popular pastime on the left. But I am dubious of its validity.
Bush chose to start a war. His enemies chose how to fight it. Bush is not responsible for their choices, and thus cannot be responsible for the civilians that they murder.
*I am setting aside my doubts as to the whole notion of responsibility for the purposes of this discussion.
Chris B,
How many died so that you can post freely on an internet site? How many is too many?
http://www.william-shakespeare.info/act4-script-text-henry-v.htm
I would draw people’s attention to the part which begins thusly:
“KING HENRY V
I dare say you love him not so ill, to wish him here
alone, howsoever you speak this to feel other men’s
minds: methinks I could not die any where so
contented as in the king’s company; his cause being
just and his quarrel honourable.”
While I know that Shakespeare is specifically talking about souls and salvation here, a possible and logical extrapolation is that the decisions of individuals under his command are the responsibility of the individuals, and not the king.
1577 David Gould None died so I could post freely on an Internet site. It hadn’t been heard of in World War Two.
It was an immoral and an illegal war David. By a corrupt and an immoral government in the USA.
I have just completed a bit of an examination of the English Civil Wars. Many thousands died in the battles between Parliament and the King. And while Parliament won, in a few short years a king was back. However, the ideas fought for lived on and the triumph of parliament was in the end total. Was it worth those thousands of lives?
And that was but one step on the road to freedom. Every step is slick with the blood of innocents. Is the climb worth it?
Chris B at 1579,
It is sad that you do not think a little further back than that. Australian freedom is based on the British parliamentary system, which was won inch by inch with blood.
Chris B,
All wars are immoral. The legal technicalities are meaningless, imo.
We take our freedoms for granted, and call the throwing of a shoe at a leader without death resulting a minor thing. Yet for most of the world such a thing cannot be done. It is impossible.
And this in a thread about censorship.
Is my pomposity way over the top or what? 😉
And thanks for the congratulations. 🙂
1582 David Gould So has every other system that’s come up through the ages. In a time when we are more civilised. The corrupt American system fought a completely unnecessary war. Hopefully they will pay for it.
Chris B,
We may be more civilised. Most of the world is not. We know of only one path to freedom.
We disagree about the necessity of the war. I think that there are few more wars of a similar nature that need to be fought. One in Zimbabwe, for instance; one in Burma; one in the Congo; one in Saudi Arabia; one in Iran. Everywhere that there is dicatatorship and opression and death and we sit and watch. And the wars will be immoral. But not fighting them is even more so.
Bush attacked Iraq for the wrong reasons. But it was a war that needed to be fought.
Virgin Media broadband speeds up.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7776139.stm
Diogenes – insightful comments as usual and something for me to mull over in my little box
David – Great stuff ! – My better(much much smarter) half just got her final result as well. Straight HD’s with one exception where she missed the HD by 2 points. I encouraged her to ask for it to upgraded. “To hell with it, I’ve had enough” was the response 😀
Ah Uni – I wouldn’t go through that again for any money 😉
Thanks, Spam Box.
I love studying, actually. I am interested in going on to honours if possible, and then further if I am smart enough (I have my doubts on that score – some of the advanced maths stuff just looks … incomprehensible.)
Oh, and I left China off my list because even if victory were possible there the price would be too high.
The only other options are basically sitting around waiting hundreds of years while these nations gradually move to democracy – and they will move there via blood, as we did, if they move there at all. (I do not think that there is a historical dialectic that means democracy and the freedoms that accompany it are inevitable, but it seems reasonably likely that such will be reached after a sufficient time period.)
And this is an argument that I will not win. 🙂
The face of future broadband.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7116596.stm
It’s good if you can actually enjoy it, I always found it a drain. For me it was always about the piece of paper at the end and boy was I glad when I got it. I did honors though as it seemed to me to be good value for the bit of extra effort – better employment options and more income but after that, no more for me thanks. 😀
I’ve seen people doing PhD’s and they never, ever, look happy 😉
Oh, I get grumpy even now if I cannot understand something, so I am sure that there will be times during a PhD that I will be very grumpy indeed. 😉
Big emission cuts ruled out
http://business.theage.com.au/business/big-emission-cuts-ruled-out-20081215-6ymf.html?page=-1
It is pretty much guaranteed that there will no significant global agreement reached on emissions. China and India will go on their merry way. Many animals are going to die; many poorer nations are going to get poorer. But we’ll be okay. And in 40 years there will be sufficient cheap and clean energy available that will solve the problem. Too late for many species, of course.
David Gould at 1597
Isn’t this a coin with two sides? According to the theory of evolution, changes in the environment cause some species to die out, and at the same time, other species proliferate and new species to emerge. I keep hearing about the species we know – but I don’t often hear about the new.
And also too late for the Great Barrier Reef, the Murray, and Kakadu. Not to mention hundreds of coastal homes.
To detect a new species is very difficult as changes as speciation is slow.
The rate of species destruction cannot be made up for in a short time period. It took millions of years for the earth to recover from previous rapid mass extinctions.
Some current species will, however, do well as the climate changes – just as, for example, some species have done very well out of massive urbanisation while other species have been driven extinct. So you are correct there.
There will be human winners out of climate change, too. Some areas will become more hospitable and better for agriculture, for example.