The Australian Federal Government has just released a white paper detailing a proposed carbon emissions reduction target of between 5% and 15% by 2020 relative to 2000 levels. The 5% target is described as unconditional whereas the 15% target is described as subject to global agreement where all major economies commit to substantially restrain emissions and all developed countries take on comparable reductions to that of Australia.
The white paper goes on to argue Australia’s unique position in the global war on climate, citing a per capita impact of between 34–41% below 1990 levels, in effect demonstrating that Australia’s proposed commitment is ahead of the Europeans (per capita reduction is projected at 24-34%) and ahead of our cousins (projected 25% per capita sacrifice).
The report argues that Australia’s particular national circumstances (a strong population growth projection, heavy reliance on fossil fuels, etc.) make for greater structural adjustment when compared with many other developed nations.
However, what I don’t see in the report is a sufficient connection to the bigger issue:
Kirribilli Removals – 15 December 2008:
If permafrost melts across the vast areas of Russia and Canada, then we can kiss our arses goodbye
385 replies on “Kissing our arses goodbye?”
I think the biggest problem in the way we are framing this debate is in terms of percentage cuts to per capita emissions.
Australia’s emissions are about twice as large per capita than Europe’s. Thus, Rudd claiming that us cutting our emissions per capita by close to 30 per cent is better than the European target of a cut of 25 per cent per capita is a bit misleading. Europe are already doing better than us – they are coming off a lower base.
What we should be talking about are world baseline permitted emissions per capita and then providing a means by which each nation will move to that baseline. For some, this will enable an increase in emissions; for others – Australia particularly – drastic cuts.
We need to get global per capita emissions down to around 4 metric tonnes per capita per year.
David Gould at 101
The per capita argument gets wobblier and wobblier the closer you look (not that per capita assessment is wrong, just that per capita change can be used in very misleading ways).
Well, the argument needs to be a per capita one – if it is not, then China and India will simply walk away, pointing out that their per capita emissions are a fraction of those in the west. But Rudd is starting this argument from the wrong end. We need to set the target at a specific number by a specific date and not argue about percentages taken from different bases. The percentage reduction per capita argument is just ridiculous.
(Oh, and the ‘4 metric tonnes per capita’ is my target for 2050, and will mean that global emissions then are the same as they are now.)
Yes, it is very misleading. And deliberately so, as Rudd is trying to sell this as us doing better than Europe. In cuts, we may be; but in emissions, we won’t be. And that is the shell game Rudd is using.
I think Rudd is framing the argument so he can get the Liberals on board, then get it through the senate. At the moment I agree with KR’s assessment until proven otherwise.
Rudd is doing what is politically possible. I cannot fault him on it.
I never thought that we would get a decent global agreement in place. I think that my global target of 4 tonnes per capita by 2050 – which, as I have said before, means that in 2050 we will be pumping out the same amount of CO2 globally as we do now – is probably the best outcome one could hope for.
I am resigned to the environment being stuffed and the third world screwed. Massive damage to both is inevitable, and has been inevitable for quite some time.
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64265
Mon Dec 15:
http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/jeffdanziger;_ylt=ArSH37yEmD37NLhaiscY0XzmcLQF
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64230
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64240
Dec 15:
http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/tomtoles;_ylt=Atw_XRDUf0dJoQ5yIrYdFV7mcLQF
Penny Wong speaking on the proposal.
http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/news/audio/am/200812/20081216-am01-wong-ets.mp3
Some classics there, Ecky, especially the Sherfflus. That’s the only regret about Dubya going very soon.
It’d be nice to see him hit (or narrowly missed) by shoe-throwers at all his public gatherings. Cheney, too, for that matter.
Bush ducked a good bouncer.
Fortunately he didn’t drive it to the boundary for four.
Obama Announces Energy, Environment Team.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/15/politics/main4670498.shtml
Yea, no more voodoo economics. Fundamentalist clap trap that got us into this spot in the first place.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/15/politics/main4670498.shtml
Steven Chu, energy secretary-designate.
The Liberals will surely have to pass the legislation in the senate. Rudd could easily paint them as anti American. 😈
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/15/politics/main4670498.shtml
Can Turnball defy the climate change non-believers/sceptics in the Coalition?
Well then, we couldn’t be accused of being hive-minded on emissions targets , could we Ticsters?
🙂
Yeah, Don, Sheffius is a mensch amongst cartoonists. Consistently there or thereabouts with brilliance.
Biscuit taken then lost.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/business/media/16lampoon.html?_r=1
How many CEO’s and senior executives will lose their jobs over climate change and all the other crap going down in seppo land.
Spare a thought for them ticsters and we should all get in and help them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDC0qcf0kzE
Congrats on your results Gouldie. Now isn’t it time you went and did some more study. 😉
I would much rather wait and see before i go ape on KR and his Government.
I am really dissapointed that lots of ideas have been forced overseas and there appears not much happening here with suitable clean alternatives.
Maybe they are sitting on the fence waiting to see what obama does and i would no be surprised if he runs with this guy’s ideas of new clean energy and thus jobs etc flowing on. Obi did mention turning the empty factories in to factories making wind turbines. I like this guys take on it all.
Maybe just needs Gouldie to run the maths over it.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081210171908.htm
Meanwhile the imbecile has set about to reward his loyal followers by burning the midnight oil and signing in laws that will have a disastrous effect on the new US governments attempts at reducing environmental damage.
He just can not get it. The midnight cowboy.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/14/george-bush-midnight-regulations
Diogenes
I see South Aus is trying to lead the field in getting rid of exhaust emissions.
Are they going to succeed in banning the bikies FFS!
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24809115-5006301,00.html
Will we really have to wait for global warming etc to destroy our crops for food.
They well may be a thing of the past before we even get there if these wreckless bastards keep getting their way.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Raids-on-Seeds-life-itsel-by-Linn-Cohen-Cole-081215-45.html
Hmmmmmmmmmm!
Everyone must be reading a good book.
This meltdown has to be a bit hotter than global warming at the moment. How those noughts just roll off the tongue. They can’t even afford a lemonade iceblock to cool down.
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/deflation-strikes-hard-what-to-do-2-28734
Gaffhook at 123
Just picked up my copy of Deer Hunting with Jesus.
🙂
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64259
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64256
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64255
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64239
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64241
http://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/20081216_flying_shoes/
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64238
Zero. Fed funds rate is now virtually zero, and the next step is to print even more money, but we all know where that leads:
“At some point, and without knowing the timing, the Fed is going to have to destroy all that money it is creating,” said Alan Blinder, a professor of economics at Princeton and a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, said the central bank. “Right now, the crisis is created by the huge demand by banks for hoarding cash. The Fed is providing cash, and the banks want to hoard it. When things start returning to normal, the banks will want to start lending it out. If that much money is left in the monetary base, it would be extremely inflationary.”
NYT
…so you’ve all been warned about what will eventually be coming! LOL
Pelosi Lays Down Law
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2008/12/16/pelosi_lays_down_law.html
Obama taps Chicago schools chief to head Education.
more..
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-names-chicago-schools-chief-to-head-education-2008-12-16.html
Yeah! Australia gets a mention.
from the same article as above..
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-names-chicago-schools-chief-to-head-education-2008-12-16.html
Thanks, Gaffhook. Already on it. ‘Naive Set Theory’ is the book that I am reading at the moment. It is actually very interesting – if you like that sort of thing, of course. 😉
Enemy Combatant
As to challenging my marks in a Prince Hal kind of way, if it was not a first year maths unit, I would have. But as the only marks that count towards my honours ambitions are second and third year maths unit, it is a bit of a waste of effort. No-one is ever going to look at my grade for discrete mathematics.
Still Gouldie, a pass, a distinction and a high D is a pretty good effort while you’re holding down a job on The Hill and boxing on ferociously in blogdom.
Let’s hope the blighters at your Tech lift their game when they’re setting next year’s exams and take the trouble to proof read the papers before going to print. I’d find out who stuffed-up and “file it away quietly” so if that party gives you any serious static down the road apiece you can demonstrate that party’s carelessness (bordering on negligence) to your advantage. Academic Insurance.
In this instance, The Prince who prompted my comments was Florentine.
🙂
Isn’t it a pity that politics rears its ugly head in the battle against global warming? I firmly believe rudd would have gone for a more ambitious target if he thought the Libs would support him.
I have often thought that certain ministries should be outside of politics, in the way things are managed in war time. It should be possible to set up a group of highly able scientists and industrialists, led by a joint Labour, Coalition and Greens committee. If all parties could just accept that winning this particular battle is for the good of the country, not the good of a particular party or a particular group of people.
The same goes for international efforts, since failure overall will hit based on geography, not the individual effort made by a single country. At least internationally summits to discuss and formulate solutions are going ahead. If that can be done internationally, surely it should be easy to manage that at national level?
Ah, Mac’s patron. I may play that game in theory politically, but I am too nice a guy in real life. 😉
kerneels,
The problem with setting things beyond politics is that it can only be done for things that are beyond politics. 🙂
Global warming, and our response to it, are not. There are genuine disagreements, along with self-interested forces.
I would also recommend against a national summit at this point. Such a summit would be politically disastrous for the government, considering that they have already decided on a course (and have done so with lots of consultation, plus the Garnaut review).
When you read the contrarian positions, there is no reasoning with them. Imagine, for example, if one of the coalition members on the committee was Danna Vale. She would be going on about warming on Mars all the time.
But it would be nice if everyone was in at least general agreement on this issue. 🙁
I was having a little look at coal reserves.
The world currently uses around 7 gigagtonnes a year. There are somewhere between 800 to 900 gigatonnes of proven coal reserves world wide.
If we consumed 7 gigatonnes a year for the next 100 years, we would put more carbon in the atmosphere than we have until this point, and by a pretty large margin. So five degrees of warming within the next 100 years is certainly something that we could do to ourselves.
David Gould at 136
It would be interesting to factor into this the expected life of coal as a saleable commodity. With carbon trading schemes kicking in around the industrialized world there will be more emphasis on getting alternatives into the cost competitive spectrum (and here I’m thinking about things like space based solar power which could be operational in less than 20 years).
Catrina,
I think that coal will be around for a while yet. Despite the scepticism from some, clean coal is going to be big in just a few years.
I would suggest, however, that there will not be much coal being used in 50 years from now – if any, in fact.
“But in an emailed newsletter sent yesterday, Liberal senator Cory Bernardi said he remained “unconvinced about the need for an ETS given that carbon dioxide is vital for life on earth and the earth hasn’t warmed since 1998″. Nationals senators have also come out against the scheme. ”
From the Australian.
This is the kind of thinking that still exists in some quarters. There is no means by which we can move beyond politics on this issue, unfortunately. Paul Kelly is right: this was a brilliant move by Rudd.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2008/
The temperature data for 2008 is out. A cool year by comparison to the last little while, but still a hot year – especially when you take into account la Nina and the solar minimum.
Latest prediction about Minnesotta: once the recounting has been done and disputed ballots are counted or not counted, Al Franken will win by about 100 votes – according to Daily Kos.
David Gould at 140
What I want is someone with a spinning propeller attached to a beanie to tell me where the perfect place to live will be in about 10 years for a period of about 20 years (taking into account that I don’t mind a dry cold winter, and I like balmy summer afternoons, and I like occasional thunder and lightning too).
P.S. I need high speed broadband and ready access to an international airport, preferably in some really nice undiscovered part of Australia.
Australia 3/16. 🙁
Catrina,
Canberra is cold in winter, hot in summer. And recently we have been getting more electrical storms. Of course, in 20 years you will have to drink your own sweat to survive. But that is a small price to pay.
David Gould at 143
Canberra is cold and wet (I want cold and dry).
The electric storms are good but its better when your overlooking the sea and backed by a dark forest, lighting flashes turning night to day as you stand on the veranda (glass in hand) and count the number of seconds until the thunder rolls across the horizon. BTW – I’m not planning on drinking my own sweat any time soon – but I will take a decent old Riesling as a compromise solution.
🙂
We will become cold and dry …
Sock and Awe. Knock out Bush with a shoe. 😈
http://www.sockandawe.com
Chris B at 146
I got Bush !!!!
(max score = 7)
Beat me. I only got him twice.
Yeay! I got him seven times. Thanks for the motivation. Not that I needed any with Bush on the receiving end.
Absolute waterfront is out, Cat. Unless you’re into sharing with sea salamanders. A weatherboard two-story on a headland could be the go. Maybe deck the joint out like a Tim Burton movie set when storms start are a brewin’.
http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/dd142/tomsac69/nightmare.jpg
Remembering your wonderful story about clocking the kindy bully on the schnoz when he got on your case many moons ago, here’s an inspirational address from Anna Funder. Anyone who ever had any doubts about Putin’s essential Fascism need listen no furthur. Her delivery is a tad patchy but the power of her WORDS drive the truth home.
Disclaimer: I’m an unabashed admirer Funder’s novel, “Stasiland” and when the film, “The Lives of Others”, played cinemas a couple of years back, it hit home with oomph aplenty.
http://www.themonthly.com.au/tm/node/1330
I can see that will become a viral game. I’ve already sent it off to friends. Maybe I need to send it to enemies as well. 😈
Chris B at 149
Not good enough kid – you need 9 to match Catrina!
It’s interesting that a conservative government got us into this mess and it’s the conservative governments that refuse to act. Left wing governments are saving the day all around the world. The conservative governments are so blind they cannot see. The real worry is in ten years time they will still be in denial, and the problem will start again.
http://www.euronews.net/en/article/11/12/2008/eu-split-over-response-to-economic-woes/
Chris B — make that 14!
😆
EU parliament battle looms on 48-hour week.
more…
http://www.theparliament.com/latestnews/news-article/newsarticle/eu-parliament-battle-looms-on-48-hour-week/
PES Party of European Socialists.
more…
http://www.pes.org
This will be another nail in the coffin of Thatcherism.
154 Catrina Looks like I am taking a beating from Catrina. 😈
Ecky, I heard Anna Funder on RN the other day, talking about the courage it took to face off the fascist leadership of Russia…and no matter what hardships one faces in life, they are as nothing compared with the things she described.
Margaret Thatcher once said she would never allow high speed trains to go from the English Channel to the center of London because it provided to much competition to the ferries.
Eurostar at St Pancras railway station
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eurostar_at_St_Pancras_railway_station.jpg
Saint Pancras. Have a look at the magnificent architecture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Pancras_International_station
Where is St Pancras?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Pancras,_London
So Margaret Thatcher, suck eggs!
Damn! Now the horse and cart journey to London will be a thing of the past! How many jobs will be lost?
St Pancras exterior was used in the Harry Potter films.
SEC Probes of Madoff are ‘Deeply Troubling,’ Cox Says.
more..
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a5SbwJUi617M&refer=home
Bush-Era Abortion Rules Face Possible Reversal
Obama Team Looks at Regulation Set to Be Finalized This Week Letting Medical Staff Refuse to Take Part in Practices They Oppose.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122947155578512197.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
For Obama, Job First.
You may need to be registered.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/16/AR2008121602478.html
Tues Dec 16:
http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/mikeluckovich;_ylt=A0WTUZKzl0hJ6F8B3QUDwLAF
Tues Dec 16:
http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/patoliphant;_ylt=AtmWiMgL6LY05dl86AdVw8Dd.sgF
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64296
http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2008/12/16/tomo/
Madoff. TARP Billlions MIA. Where’s the oversight? Where’s the regulatory crackdown? Where’s the outrage?
http://www.politico.com/arena/
The TARP has been a disaster from its less than immaculate conception.
Gov. Rod Blagojevich is small apples compared to the 50 billion that’s gone missing.
http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Dean_Baker_2D267A6D-C3B8-4FA2-91FB-6EA0DCEBDCFB.html
Ohio.
Dennis Willard: Election reforms rejection expected
Changes are necessary, but this bill is flawed.
more..
http://www.ohio.com/news/36279279.html
Robert Reich , in his article “Logic of Keynes in today’s world”, highlights the need to protect “the common good”:
” What we most lack, or are in danger of losing, are the things we use in common – clean air, clean water, public parks, good schools, and public transportation, as well as social safety nets to catch those of us who fall. Common goods like these don’t necessarily use up scarce resources; often, they conserve and protect them.”
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2008/12/logic-of-keynes-in-todays-world.html
Well, even if we in Oz aren’t quite ready to ‘kiss our arses goodbye’, the poor Seppos are really getting ready to:
But what the Fed is saying is that the economy is completely stuffed: corporate earnings are going to worsen as sales slump. It is trying to keep deflation at bay and overall the economy is in far worse shape than previously thought. Some economists are now forecasting that it shrunk by an annual rate of 6% to 8% this quarter.
(Crikey, Glenn Dyer)
…got that? 6-8% annualised shrinkage of the economy! My god, that’s truly incredible, and all the Fed can do is nationalise the banks and print money to try and stave off deflation.
Ladies and gentleman, the end of an empire is NOT a pretty sight.
And god help Obama, ‘coz he is gonna need it, by the truckload.
171
KIRRI
What i have trouble coming to grips with is the fact that the Rodent and the worlds greatest treasurer must have been somewhat aware of something like this happening and they were still on the stump right up to election night telling us how good a shape the E was in.
It is barely just over 12 months now but all this shit started happening straight after our elections.
I would love to really know how much information they really had then and why they were telling us so many straight out lies.
171
Kirri
I have been talking to a guy who sells tools to the building and construction industry. He told me that the most popular nail gun in the US they buy wholesale for $229. They normally retail for $329.
They are not selling any at the give away price of $169 which is $60 below cost. They have lots of stock and are trying to unload.
Something different i suppose. The banks lining up to kiss your arse a welcome by paying you to borrow.
Kirri is this wierd or what?
KR at 171
What’s your take on the following?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/28270163#28270163
Cat
She’s hot!!!!!!!
But not as hot as Cat!
175
Catrina
I like Rachel Maddow, she at least tries to get the right answers to pertinent questions, rather than blab the explanation du jour, like so much that passes as ‘journalism’ these days. (She was on Jon Stewart’s show recently, and he clearly had a lot of respect for her abilities.)
As for whether there was a crisis or not, it’s probably true that it wasn’t how it was portrayed, but that it could have turned much uglier if the financial markets didn’t think the Fed was going to bail out the big guys. That’s how I read it, but hey, books will be written about this whole episode for many years to come, and no doubt we’ll get quite a few different interpretations. That says it wasn’t clear what was going on, that the fear of massive collapse was driving the players and they did not have a script to follow.
Has the Fed done this badly? Almost certainly, but the question is could they have done things any better? Probably not considering the rapid developments, the political contingencies, and the need to be ‘seen’ to be doing something.
My personal view is that trying to save the banks is impossible, they’ll implode in their own good time no matter what the Fed does, and buying dodgey assets, printing cash and all the other ploys will not be able to stop the decline, so why go that way? Ah, human nature, attempting to do something to ‘help’ when its really a lost cause. Admitting that to themselves, saying to themselves that our financial markets are in disarray, our economy is cactus, and it’s folly to try and change the outcome…that’s much harder to do than throwing taxpayer’s money at it.
Lets go over Bernard Madoff’s 50 billion dollars. This administration has over seen the biggest bunch of corporate crooks the WORLD has ever seen. The were first warned about this guy in 1999. Not to mention Enron World Com, Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac.
Gaffy, it’s ALL weird! We’ve entered the financial twilight zone where nothing makes any sense. (I’ve been watching the 30yr bond rising in price for days and it’s completely insane how much money is being thrown down that well hole for fear of it being lost elsewhere). There’s panic and uncertainty about any institution’s ability to stay solvent.
But what is REALLY scary is that any comparison with Japan in the 90’s fails on the fact that the Japanese had savings, lots of them, but the US has absolutely none and a VERY big hole in their place. And that hole gets deeper by the day.
If Bernanke can’t stoke the ashes of inflation and get the fire going again, they are truly fcuked. Their debts will continue to grow exponentially while their ability to pay will be corroded by deflation.
So there’s Ben, blowing and puffing to re-start inflation and chucking freshly printed dollar bills on the coals in a desperate attempt to get prices to move up, to see people spending and the banks throwing money at people again.
Hang on, isn’t that how this whole mess got started? Yep, and they’re doing everything in their power to get it going again.
Can they succeed? Maybe. But be sure of this: once that fire flares up again it will proceed to burn down the entire house!
Everyone keeps going on about Chicago. What about all the politicians connected to the biggest crook of them all? GEORGE BUSH. He makes Gov. Rod Blagojevich look like a kindergarten kid.
Bush is responsible for the biggest financial melt down since the thirties and they are worried about Blagojevich.
Yes nail Blagojevich. But make sure as hell they nail Bush as well.
If Bush gets away with what he has done over the last 8 years, then it will all happen again. Wars and the financial situation.
The economy is looking like something out of early last century, and this sounds awfully like 1920 too:
BAGHDAD — Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain confirmed Wednesday that British troops will leave Iraq next summer.
On a surprise visit, he said in a statement with Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, “The role played by the U.K. combat forces is drawing to a close. These forces will have completed their tasks in the first half of 2009 and will then leave Iraq.”
I can’t get on to Sock and Awe. I bet its overloaded. I know lots have people have passed it on, I have feed back already.
I know it was very popular in one call center.
185 Kirribilli Removals. Gordon Brown did wait till Bush was almost out the door.
Kirri,
Can’t thank you enough for sharing your expertise and your timely warnings…while I may have had sleepless nights as a result, it has certainly had me alert, alarmed and hopefully now prepared! 🙂
Am I correct in feeling that even flight to cash/term deposits could be at risk here? A neighbour on the verge of retiring told me last night that she had moved most of her savings into super last year,thinking it would be the wiser option, and now she appears to have lost it all,and then some. Terrible for many older single women who were late to super in the first place.
Some of us are long enough in the tooth to have experienced the tough times after the war and fortunate to then instinctively save for the rainy day, as well as having the skills to make do in times of need. So much easier to go from poverty to wealth than the other way around. Pity the later generations who have only known prosperity and think it the norm.
But on the upside, the environment may benefit as we return to the basics of life and hopefully reduce our carbon footprint.
To be fair, it’s just a bad case of jetlag in my case, Kirri 🙂
but, I bet there are plenty out there losing sleep as we speak.
Glad your health is now ‘tickety-boo’!
Thanks for “sock&awe” ,Chris.
Dodgy keyboard is my excuse for poor score 🙂
Certainly no lack of venom as I tried to hit the target!
“Am I correct in feeling that even flight to cash/term deposits could be at risk here?”
Megan, the fundalmentals of the banking sector are essentially sound. Plans to convert to shell money globally are proceeding apace. Parity with The Cowrie is expected by February, 2009.
http://news.yahoo.com/comics/wizardofid;_ylt=A0WTUditX0lJUwYBcQYDwLAF
Key players are making huge personal sacrifices to help restore investor confidence.
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/64349
Yes, Ecky is right, our banks aren’t in any danger of falling over (unlike the US ones, which needed to be recapitalised by the US taxpayer, and many of the small ones are disappearing on a weekly basis).
But parity with the cowrie shell is exactly where the US dollar is headed:
“We need to have significant inflation: 2% is not enough to improve solvency significantly, and we may experience 5-10% for a year or two,” Johnson and Peter Boone of the London School of Economics wrote in a recent posting on WSJ.com. “Inflation has major drawbacks and creates its own risks, but compared to the alternatives, it would be a relief.”
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/When-0-isnt-low-enough/story.aspx?guid={0C5136DB-B11E-4531-A996-A070E6D8B5CD}
…so the economic boffins are now coming out saying that ‘pushing on a string’ (ie lowering rates in an attempt to revive the economy) is futile, and the ONLY way out of a Japanese style deflationary spiral is to actually print money and cause inflation!
Whoa there sunshine! This is going to trash the US dollar and scare the nice foreigners who have kindly parked their savings in US treasuries. They will not continue to donate to this basket case only to see their capital inflated away into the ether.
Talk about being on the horns of a dilemma! And the first problem is how do you ‘control’ the level of inflation when you’ve printed vast amounts of cash and increased the money supply by the massive bailouts and stimuli? It’s always the danger that this beast takes on a life of its own and eats you! Just ask Paul Volcker how hard it is to stop this beast in its tracks!
“I’ve abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system.”
— President Bush, in an interview with CNN.
Andrew Sullivan: “Just as he used torture to defend freedom. And occupied a country in order to liberate it.”
(polwire)
“Did we have to destroy the town in order to save it”?[9]
~Marine Captain Myron Harrington who commanded a one-hundred-man company during the battle*.
(wiki)
* Hue, Vietnam, 1968.
“He’s the one who gives his body
as a weapon to a war
and without him all this killing can’t go on”
Bufft Sainte-Marie
“Gee, honey, fancy seeing you here! Sabrina and I were just lying on the bed comparing heights as you walked in. I’m tallest.”
~The Universal Husband
“He’s five feet two and he’s six feet four….”
Morning all, well just back from a wild time in the big smoke……..I stumble upon *this* WTF The rude one himself on the TV!!!
Well worth a look.
http://lauraflanders.firedoglake.com/2008/12/17/grittv-live-at-noon-you-cant-make-this-stuff-up/#comments
“Moral hazard is dead”, and just to prove it:
“Too big to fail.” The words may become central to everyone’s thinking. A quick search in New York Times articles of the past few years shows that the phrase was used six times in 2007, and only twice in each of the years 2004, 2005 and 2006; this year it has already been employed over 50 times.
NY Times
…we have, ladies and gentlemen, entered the twilight zone where GW Bush now claims to be saving the free market! LOL
This absurd man, this Forrest Gump, this poor bewildered idiot son is standing in the maelstrom as it wrecks the nation and he utters inanities.
Getup is committing sacrilege.
Taking the piss out of Kev during the boxing day test.
https://www.getup.org.au/campaign/ClimateActionNow&id=488
Hell’s bells,I might even have to donate some of Kev’s pensioner xmas present to help shaft the little turd.
Another blow against Thatcherism.
more…
http://euobserver.com/9/27312
EU moves towards mandatory lobbyists register.
more..
http://euobserver.com/9/27310
European Parliament approves climate change package.
more…
http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1229513521.59