An interview with a former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski speaking to the subject of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the recent escalation in tensions leading to the December 2008 Israeli-Hamas Conflict.
From Wikipedia is a definition of Retributive Justice …
Retributive justice is a theory of justice that considers that proportionate punishment is a morally acceptable response to crime, with an eye to the satisfaction and psychological benefits it can bestow to the aggrieved party, its intimates and society.
Further reading on the Wikipedia definition of retribution, the following statement appears …
In ethics and law “Let the punishment fit the crime” is the principle that the severity of penalty for a misdeed or wrongdoing should be reasonable and proportional to the severity of the infraction. The concept is common to most cultures throughout the world. Its presence in the ancient Jewish culture is shown by its inclusion in the law of Moses, specifically in Deuteronomy 19:17-21, which includes the punishments of “life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.” Many other documents reflect this value in the world’s cultures. However, the judgement of whether a punishment is appropriately severe can vary greatly between cultures and individuals.
599 replies on “Retribution”
Chris- much as we all love and admire Obama you need to settle down. He is not the Messiah, as he has himself said, and he is facing one goddawful mess which he has no hope of cleaning up – environmentally, economically ,and globally politically. And he will cop it when the shit keeps happening – it’s the nature of politics unfortunately.
Politico
It’s the economic rollout, stupid!
For more of these death defying issues stay tuned to the Rocky and Bullwinkle Show. Starring the one and only moose that Sarah hasn’t got. Bullwinkle! Click here for more.
396 Gaff
I would suggest Feinstein is pissed off for more reasons than she wasn’t consulted. The fact that she wasn’t consulted, as the incoming head of the Intelligence Committee, is in itself telling. The fact that the outgoing head of the IC J.Rockefeller also wasn’t consulted ,and is pissed, is also telling.
There is a power play going on here.
If Obama is slapping down Feinstein and Rockefeller, then the world may become a slightly safer place. They are every bit as bad as neocons.
Politico. More from the same story.
It’s the economic rollout, stupid!
Politico Page 2 continued
Politico.
Swearing-in the 111th Congress. Video.
Click here to view this. Cheney must be chocking on his Wheaties.
I love the way Nancy Peloci gets all the grand children involved in the second video.
The Hill.
Liberals have a trillion reasons to accept tax cuts in stimulus .
Read the rest of the article by clicking here.
Is it just me , or has anyone else noticed that HuffPo has gone v. quiet on the Israeli /Palestinian conflict ?
The Hill
More of the same article as above.
Actually – having a look at NY Times, Washington post and a few others – they’ve ALL gone quiet on Israel/Palestine.
hmmm… could there be *ahem* influences at play here?
at least Obi is not pretending it’s not happening. Kind of.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0109/Obama_deplores_civilian_deaths_in_Gaza.html
Then again – perhaps I’m misjudging Israel.
such decency is surely to be admired.
3 whole hours every day to get ready to be obliterated…
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/01/07/israel.gaza/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
“Is it just me , or has anyone else noticed that HuffPo has gone v. quiet on the Israeli /Palestinian conflict ?”
You’re definitely on to something there, jen.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090106_why_do_so_few_speak_up_for_gaza/
Thanks Ecky. Thought i was being paranoid, but clearly there is a silencer on this as Isareal’s behaviour gets harder to justify. It’s very disappointing though to see the so-called “non MSM ” bow down to pressure- from both the right and left it would seem – and try and downplay this. Bottom line- it’s wrong. No matter what harm has been done to Israeli’s in the past – this is a fucking disgrace.
End of story.
And I hope Obama shows some courage over this or it will be sorely disappointing.
jen at 408
Your not alone Jen.
NYT: Israel Halts Attack Briefly to Allow Aid Into Gaza
I just love those moments in history where you can stand up in room, talk about a moment in time, and feel proud that you’ve shared something special. The lesson tonight is about humility – you can isolate them, starve them, bleed them and so long as you let them bury their dead you can go to sleep at night with a clear conscience knowing you did the right thing.
The real worry about Israel is, that if Benjamin Netanyahu wins the election. He will be far worse than what the current lot are doing. At the moment he is leading the polls. According to this, what appears to be a right wing blog. The American Spectator
Whoops. That’s what happens when you post late at night.
http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/02/new-poll-shows-netanyahu-still
Reuters
ANALYSIS-Gaza offensive set to boost Israel’s Livni.
Click here for more…
The Hill.
Click here to read more
At least they will be able to get a lot more work done now. As long as they don’t become a rubber stamp.
At least Kieth Olbermann understands the John Howard thing …
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/28530347#28530347
Hamas Rejects Gaza Cease-Fire
Time Magazine
Maybe we have reached a point in time where we need a legal division of the Red Cross.
421
Cat
😆
Twelve days to go to Xmas! Well it will seem like all our Xmases will come at once. 😆
MSNBC
The Bush years — then and now.
Click here for the misadventures of George Bush
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/01/07/1736214.aspx
Obama to make case for ‘urgent action’ on economic recovery plan.
Click here for more
The Importance of the Humanitarian Pause:
After a liesurely three hour lunch, surgical strikes resumed with widespread precision.
These postprandial operations were an enormous success. Hundreds of Palestinian women and children were saved by the timely interventions before the hospitals in which they were recovering were smart-bombed to rubble.
http://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/20090107_success_fish_israel/
The Hill
More from the Hill
421 Catrina. Part of that clip appeared on AM this morning. Maybe AM read our blog, to keep up to date with the latest in international politics. 😈
Change.org
Chief Performance Officer announcement.
Click here
Gaffhook at 371,
Just because someone has suffered does not make them rational. As such, just because Cindy Sheehan’s son was killed in Iraq – thus causing her suffering – does not shelter her from criticism of her position. The calling for criminal charges to be laid against Bush, Cheney, Howard and Blair is irrational. Thus, the characterisation of those calling for them as ‘left wing loonies’, while certainly hyperbolic, is not out of place.
I have no problem with publicly saying that Cindy Sheehan, and others who call for criminal charges, are left-wing loonies. If it is of any help, I have suffered in my life also – a friend of mine died in high school, my grandmother died a couple of years ago, and two of my cats have died over the years. I am unsure how relevant those things are to the discussion, however.
Just out of interest, why does Hamas launching rockets daily into Israeli suburbs not stir up outrage on this blog?
And I do not want to alienate anyone here, by the way. This is an incredibly emotive issue, obviously. We have hundreds of people dying and the question is: why can’t they all just stop killing one another? And the sad fact seems to be that they can’t stop and will never stop.
🙁
Anyway, I am hoping that just because my sympathies tend to be a little more with Israeli goals and policies that I am not seen as the bad guy.
432 David Gould Prior to George Bush she was a Republican.
435 Republican voter.
Chris,
Formally being a Republican does not alter the fact that the view she currently holds is irrational. Indeed, if she was a Republican, that indicates that she might well be prone to holding irrational views. 😉
David there are a lot of Republicans that have change sides because of the war. Why do they then become left wing loonies.
In regard to the middle east, it’s the same old thing. Religion. Just look how long it took to sort out Ireland.
Chris B at 438,
The view that Bush, Cheney, Howard and Blair should be prosecuted for war crimes (or other abuses of power) is an irrational one and it generally stems from the left. Indeed, if someone has abandoned the right over this and moved to the left, that seems further evidence that this view is a left-wing one. Thus, we have that it is a left-wing view and that it is irrational. That is where it fits with ‘left-wing looney’.
While religion is certainly a huge issue, it is in reality a clash of societies (in each of which religion plays a huge part, of course) over territory. And this is almost identical to the situation in Northern Ireland, as you say.
However, I think that the Israeli situation will take longer than the 350 years that the Irish situation took to bring to some kind of resolution …
A mere 700,000 Seppos lost their jobs in December, and the forecast is for a deficit of over a trillion bucks.
My god, it’s truly awful and there is no end in sight. Obama’s got a heck of a job to do!
Shalom, shalom everyone, peace and goodwill to all!
Gouldie at 441:
“However, I think that the Israeli situation will take longer than the 350 years that the Irish situation took to bring to some kind of resolution …”
David, following your most enlightened comments about Cindy Sheehan, no one would possibly regard you as anything but a deep global thinker going forward.
“Israeli situation”?
David, do Palestinians have a “situation” too as they and their forebears have been roaming the neighbourhood for a long, long time before 1948 when “Israel” first found itself capable of being involved in an “Israeli situation”?
And that Jewish chippy’s son and local peacenik, Jesus Christ; word has it that coupla millenia back he spent a fair bit of time knockin’ around the same the same nooks and crannies, ‘cept young J.C. didn’t spend his days palling around with warmongering pollies in members bars. Young J.C. hung with fishermen, prostitutes and arty types considered by the ruling Roman classes of the time as “the scum of the earth”.
Funnily enough, these days a lot of people in positions of power(and their factota) who claim to be Christians, also claim that Jesus was about accumulting megabucks and conspicuously consuming what those megabucks can purchase while simultaneously waging war on whoever has stuff you want.
It has always been thus, they say.
“Blessed are the Peacemakers, for they shall gain MIC-garnered riches far beyond the lust of even the most avaricious.”
~from the sermon on the mounting of hegemony.
—————————
Dem Fundy Politics:
http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/tonyauth;_ylt=AmHnHByph37veDc.mn5w9G7mcLQF
Wed Jan 7:
http://news.yahoo.com/comics/mattbors;_ylt=Agckx39O2Ij4W5IPJh_Mtv7X.sgF
http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm/65025
Does the deficit require the US to pay interest to its creditors? I have always wondered how that worked, to be honest.
Bonjour Monsieur Demanagements! How they hangin’, son?
Obviously, the Palestinian’s have ‘a situation’, too – it is one big ‘situation’. But to argue that the Israelis are the bad guys is not sensible. They are not the good guys, but in this situation no-one is. Thus, to condemn Israel every time they attack but to shrug and ignore it every time Hamas does is a little odd.
Further, to talk about 1948 as if the world will go back to the situation as it was prior to that is simply silly. We all understand how we got to where we are today. But past injustices are rarely of any help in creating justice today.
One of Jesus’s pertinent comments was that he came not to bring peace but the sword. It seems that the sword will not be beaten into a plough for a while yet …
I should qualify my comment about injustice/justice: injuustice is rarely of any help in creating justice today if the past injustice is not put secondary to today’s justice. Obviously, past injustices often help in creating today’s justice as we learn from them.
How about I drop ‘leftwing loony’ from my posts and simply refer to the specific view as irrational? (And obviously it is irrational in my opinion). That way, I will – hopefully – no longer be causing offence.
Outing ‘Sharon Gould’: the hoaxer’s identity revealed
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/
John and George further endearing themselves to the general public
437 David Gould She’s not irrational. She is quite logical. Maybe its someone else’s is irrational. 😈
These right wing loonies all have irrational views.
450
Jen Says
John and George further endearing themselves to the general public
😆
J&G aren’t half as funny as Firstdogonthemoon today jen.
http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20090108-First-Dog-on-the-Moon.html#comments
Chris B,
If we move to simply discussing the view as irrational or rational, as opposed to the person, that will make things easier and will hopefully have me being less offensive. 😉
To further this discussion, it is my position that humans are at base rational but because of limited information or capacity or both are unable to make the most optimal rational decisions pretty much all of the time. Thus, we are not in the end rational or irrational; rather, we are subrational.
The main thing that reduces our capacity, imo, is emotion. It is a little unfortunate that, while emotion necessarily sets our goals, it can be an impediment to acheiving them. We cannot avoid emotion, of course, and neither should we aim to, but we can try and recognise the impact that emotion is having on our capacity.
OK. 😈
sorry ; link for 450
http://www.theage.com.au/world/bloggers
try again! 😡
http://www.theage.com.au/world/bloggers-up-in-arms-about-howard-bumping-obama-20090108-7cbv.html
paddy@ 453… 😆 😆
David – this is purely based on irrational emotion but I HATE GWB – have from the first time I heard him open his mouth and was gobsamcked that such an obviously stupid man could be elected POTUS. – TWICE!!
And the sycophantic morbidly stupid MSM, politicians and people the world over pandered to this moron. The greatest case of The`Empreror’s New Clothes’ ever known to man IMO. And I based my view on nothing other pure gut reaction ( and I was right :lol:). So rationality is sometimes limited in it’s application I’m afraid.
Emotion can certainly be correct. Our emotions would not exist in the form that they are were they not in some way useful from an evolutionary perspective. Fear is good in certain circumstances; anger likewise.
However, if you had examined Bush’s policies from a rational perspective, you would have reached the same conclusion. Thus, there is no limitation in application that I can see.
(I will point out here that all rational examinations must stem from an emotional basis – in other words, I can only examine something rationally in terms of my particular goals. If my goals included – for example – the destruction of the US economy, then Bush could well have been the rational choice for US President.)
I do not hate GWB. He is simply a product of his culture. And I was not surprised in any way that he won two elections for president. But then I am a pessimist. 😉
462 David Gould. No David I wouldn’t call you a pessimist. A member of the Liberal Party maybe. But not a pessimist.
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Politico.
Obama eyes Wall Street super-regulator.
For more of this story click here
Chris B,
I was a member of the Liberal Party at one point many years ago – for about two weeks. I had hoped to turn them more to the left. Alas, I failed.
So I joined the Labor Party and tried to turn them more to the left. Alas, I failed.
Now I try to turn around creationists and anti-homosexuals. It is much easier, amazingly …
Politico.
For more of this story click here
(religion debates are much less trouble than political ones …)
465 David Gould 😆
Have you heard about the two Irish Homosexuals?
Michael Fitz Patrick and Patrick Fitz Michael.
469 (groan) 😉
True love and war never run according to plan.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/08/2461894.htm
Thurs Jan 8:
http://news.yahoo.com/edcartoons/tomtoles;_ylt=AhEwGI0cLTIiqzpAx9ELdhjmcLQF
The Israeli army has admitted privately to the UN that there was no firing from the Gaza school where 42 people died after being hit by Israeli mortars.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/bombs-rain-down-as-peace-deal-accepted-in-principle-1232055.html
Fatalities since Dec 27:
Palestinians 688 ( 350approx civilians-160 children under 16.)
Israelis 10 (3 civilians )
DavidG @433-
if we must regress to “an eye for an eye” (and surely we should have moved beyod this but obviously not) then decapitation for an eye is simply disproportinate. And that does not for a minute mean that I support the initial crime, but pink-misting children at school because of damage from rocket fire is … well obviously it is obscene.
This must be one of the first bits of positive news which may hopefully be the benchmark for the future.
A big slapdown for the Imbecile.
http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSN1429892120070314?pageNumber=1
Gaffy, neocons are smelling real bad too. Been on the nostril since they spawned, really.
Cursed with the blood of innocents, they now rub and fret; wring and wash like Lady MacBeth as they scramble to spin the indelible stains upon their ugly souls.
Neoconservatism dies in Gaza
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/01/08/gaza/
470 Spam Box I didn’t choose the number it was coincidence.
Dan Froomkin (he must have helpers) weaves the machinations of Seppo City Central together as well as anyone. He could really give Huffy a run for her online money if he ever walked from WaPo.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2009/01/07/BL2009010702289.html?sid=ST2009010702302&s_pos=
I’m just smiling …
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/28549728#28549728
🙂
Obama’s Economic Speech (17min. 7 sec.):
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/28560030#28560030
The full transcript here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/08/us/politics/08text-obama.html
Cat @479,
😆
479 Catrina Rachel Meadow isn’t as cute as our Maxine McKew.
Eleven more days of that moron to go. What destruction can he do in eleven days?
Bond will not seek another term.
Like rats deserting a sinking ship.
Story continued here
Electoral Vote map
This week in Washington: a historical perspective
“Aww, gee, George, you shouldn’t have.”
“Hey, no sweat, Jahhhn. Had it imported all the way from Atlanta specially for the occasion”
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2163/2047138497_9d8eae9289.jpg?v=0
Politico
Obama wants digital TV delayed.
Very smart move. Obama would get the full blame for this problem.
People without T.V. would be a national disaster.
Continued on Politico
Politico.
Obama wins! (Officially).
continued here on Politico
Hustler Magazine and Girls Gone Wild productions have asked the government to bail them out. They said they may as well join the queue as everyone else is doing it. (They bring in around $3 to $13 billion U.S. a year). Source ABC radio.
Politico
Senate open to seating Franken.
continued on Politico
This gets my blood boiling.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/01/08/1231004199169.html
I recommend a boycott of these companies.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/get-out-americans-tell-howard-20090108-7cwm.html
Now Americans know how we’ve been feeling for the last 10 years until Howard lost his own seat and crushed his own party (I love saying that :)).
Apparently, he has still learnt nothing.
Howard is just such a small, small man.
jen at 474,
But I do not think that this is about an eye for an eye or anything like it. Whether you agree with them or not, Israel have specific military objectives in this particular conflict. These are: (1) to destroy the means by which Hamas are getting rockets and (2) to degrade the capability of Hamas to fire rockets at southern Israel.
If this attack was about an eye for an eye, then it would have occurred in late November when Hamas broke the ceasefire. However, from that period Israel was attempting to get an extension to the ceasefire. (Sincerely or otherwise, who can tell?).
It should be noted that Hezbollah has not fired a rocket at Israel since the war Israel fought there. There have been rockets fired from Lebanon since that war (the last was fired in July 2007, apart from the ones today) but both Hezbollah and Israel have confirmed that they were not fired by Hezbollah. This indicates that despite the idea that the Lebanon conflict was a defeat for Israel (and in some senses it was, as it exposed serious problems with Israeli capability) it at least achieved the goal of reducing the threat Hezbollah posed to Israel. (At the cost of many Lebanese lives, we should not forget).
One of the reasons for this, of course, is Hezbollah’s realisation that while their rockets are a good terror weapon they are pretty much useless in a military engagement.
David,
Found this Interesting from the “Jewish Voice for Peace” :
“I am outraged. I just read the text of a bill being voted on in the Senate today – a bill we cannot let pass.*
The bill, introduced by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), puts all the blame for the current violence between Israel and Gaza entirely on Hamas. It offers unconditional support to Israel, tacitly endorsing the raining down of bombs on the heads of Gazan civilians, a tactic which has led to the deaths of over 700 Palestinians in just a few weeks. In fact, it endorses continued bloodshed of both Israelis and Palestinians.
I am dumbstruck by how one-sided this bill is. The US should condemn Hamas. They are deliberately targeting civilians with Qassam rockets and 9 Israelis have died since Israel started bombing Gaza. But they should also hold Israel accountable. Accountable for denying Palestinians access to badly needed medicine, fuel and food through their year-long blockade of Gaza; accountable for endangering the lives of Israelis by repeatedly violating ceasefires and refusing to negotiate with Hamas, a group, which facts show, can maintain a ceasefire**; accountable for the destructive US-made weaponry they are using on dense population centers, which has now drawn rocket fire from southern Lebanon and threatens to enflame the rest of the Mideast; and accountable for Israel’s illegal 40-year occupation.
But it does no such thing. Instead, it reads like a press release written by AIPAC, giving Israel carte blanche to do whatever it wants whenever it wants, without legal or moral restraint. It does not call for an immediate ceasefire, or an end to Gaza’s blockade, which is also an act of war.
And after the Senate, its going to the House.
Write your representative now and tell her or him that you expect the United States to take a balanced approach. Tell them that it is in the best interests of Americans, Israelis, and Palestinians for Israel to accept a ceasefire, end the blockade, and achieve peace through an end to Israel’s 40-year old occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Cecilie Surasky,
Jewish Voice for Peace
* Amnesty vs. AIPAC: Senate to Consider AIPAC Resolution Endorsing War in Gaza Huffington Post
**Reigniting Violence: How Do Ceasefires End? Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/amnesty-vs-aipac-senate-t_b_156256.html
megan,
It is not really surprising. It seems that in modern international affairs publicly criticising allies is impossible, unfortunately.
One of the problems that I have, however, is seeing any other possible responses from Israel (assuming that stopping the rocket fire is the objective).
The blockade of Gaza is certainly a big problem. But it should be remembered that this blockade was not only imposed by Israel, but by Egypt. Hamas is a destabilising force in Egypt, being a spin off of the Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas’s violent coup overthrowing the Palestinian presidental appointees in Gaza was not a wise move on their behalf, as it did not help engender trust in their ability to provide stability.
Bizarrely enough, when Hamas were first elected, I was actually excited. I thought that with the repudiation of the corrupt institutions developed under Yassar Arafat there was a chance to move forward. All that was required was for Hamas to renounce their former intention to destroy Israel, concentrate on internal nation building and start to build ties with the outside world. Foolish me, hey? 🙁
I watched the Live Aid concert on DVD last night. U2 played ‘Sunday, Bloody Sunday’. How long, indeed.
(Obviously, there would also have been the need for Israel and the rest of the world to respond to overtures by Hamas. But the vital first step had to be the recognition of Israel’s right to exist.)
490 asanque I will no longer spend my million dollar advertising budget with those companies.
Jimmy Carter on the Gaza conflict – “An Unnecessary War”.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/07/AR2009010702645.html
Bit of an odd article, that one. While I applaud his optimism, I am unclear from whence it stems.
482
Yes she is.
483
Time will tell. He still has a week to escalate Gaza in to I ran.